Key result
PAR1 inhibition by SCH79797 in a rat model of ischemia-reperfusion injury resulted in a nonsignificant decrease in scar size from 23% to 16% (P=0.052) and attenuated adverse LV remodeling.
Why the study?
Fibroblast activity promotes adverse left ventricular remodeling leading to ischemic cardiomyopathy, and the role of PAR1 inhibition in cardiac fibrosis and remodeling is not fully understood.
Does the PAR1 inhibitor SCH79797 attenuate left ventricular remodeling and cardiac fibrosis in a rat model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury?
Does the PAR1 inhibitor SCH79797 attenuate left ventricular remodeling and cardiac fibrosis in a rat model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury?
Absolute Event Rate: 16% vs 23%
p-value: p=.052
PAR1 inhibition with SCH79797 attenuates adverse left ventricular remodeling and profibrotic activities in a rat model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.
May attenuate postinfarction remodeling in rats; leaves open clinical translation for ischemic cardiomyopathy.
PURPOSE: Fibroblast activity promotes adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling that underlies the development of ischemic cardiomyopathy. Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is a potent stimulus for fibrosis, and the extracellular signal-regulated kinases(ERK) 1/2 pathway also contributes to the fibrotic response. The thrombin receptor, protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1), has been shown to play an important role in the excessive fibrosis in different tissues. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of a PAR1 inhibitor, SCH79797, on cardiac fibrosis, tissue stiffness and postinfarction remodeling, and effects of PAR1 inhibition on thrombin-induced TGF-β and (ERK) 1/2 activities in cardiac fibroblasts. METHODS: We used a rat model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury, isolated cardiac fibroblasts, and 3-dimensional (3D) cardiac tissue models fabricated to ascertain the contribution of PAR1 activation on cardiac fibrosis and LV remodeling. RESULTS: The PAR1 inhibitor attenuated LV dilation and improved LV systolic function of the reperfused myocardium at 28 days. This improvement was associated with a nonsignificant decrease in scar size (%LV) from 23 ± % in the control group (n = 10) to 16% ± 5.5% in the treated group (n = 9; P = .052). In the short term, the PAR1 inhibitor did not rescue infarct size or LV systolic function after 3 days. The PAR1 inhibition abolished thrombin-mediated ERK1/2 phosphorylation, TGF-β and type I procollagen production, matrix metalloproteinase-2/9 activation, myofibroblasts transformation in vitro, and abrogated the remodeling of 3D tissues induced by chronic thrombin treatment. CONCLUSION: These studies suggest PAR1 inhibition initiated after ischemic injury attenuates adverse LV remodeling through late-stage antifibrotic events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Сонин et al. (2013) studied Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (n=19). SCH79797 (PAR1 inhibitor) vs. Control was evaluated on Scar size (%LV) (p=.052). PAR1 inhibition by SCH79797 in a rat model of ischemia-reperfusion injury resulted in a nonsignificant decrease in scar size from 23% to 16% (P=0.052) and attenuated adverse LV remodeling.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: