Key result
COVID-19 pandemic linked to prolonged door-to-balloon times and ~10% higher NYHA III-IV rate in AMI.
Why the study?
The COVID-19 outbreak has negatively impacted the care of patients with AMI, but little information exists on its effect on clinical management and outcomes.
Does the COVID-19 pandemic impact the management times and clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=148)
No
Does the COVID-19 pandemic impact the management times and clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The COVID-19 pandemic significantly delayed presentation and treatment times for AMI patients, which was associated with worse long-term heart failure symptoms.
AIM: The coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak in 2019 has negatively impacted the care of patients with other life-threatening diseases, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, there is little published information concerning the depth of the impact on the clinical management and outcome following AMI. METHODS: We enrolled patients with AMI who received urgent primary percutaneous coronary intervention at the Beijing Tiantan Hospital (Beijing, China) between December 1, 2019 and April 10, 2020. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts, the pre-COVID-19 group (from December 1, 2019 to January 31, 2020) and during-COVID-19 group (from February 1, 2020 to April 10, 2020) for analysis. The door-to-balloon (D to B) time, total hospitalization stay (days) and coronary care unit (CCU) hospitalization days were calculated. New York Heart Association heart functional class (NYHA class), re-hospitalization and death ratio in patients were assessed between the two cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 148 AMI patients were enrolled in this study comprising 53 patients pre-COVID-19 group and 95 patients during-COVID-19 group. Patients with AMI during-COVID-19 group had longer symptom onset to hospital time (4.5 [2.0-9.3] vs 3.0 [2.0-5.0] hours, p = 0.013) and D to B time (96 [74-119] vs 67 [52-81] minutes, p <0.001); the D to B time shortened during the study period. The two cohorts did not have significantly different number of hospitalization days, re-hospitalization rates, peak cTnI, BNP or death rates. For the one-year follow-up, the patients in the during-COVID-19 group were classified as NYHA class III-IV more frequently (9 [9.7%] vs 0 [0%], p=0.004). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected one measure of critical care of patients with AMI, NYHA classification, which may have resulted in increased medical expenses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=148). COVID-19 pandemic period vs. Pre-COVID-19 period was evaluated on NYHA class III-IV at 1-year follow-up (p=0.004). The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with prolonged door-to-balloon times (96 vs 67 minutes) and a significantly higher rate of NYHA class III-IV heart failure at 1-year follow-up (9.7% vs 0%) among patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: