Key result
RV-GLS yields ~6-fold higher odds of accurately detecting RV dysfunction in cardiac surgery patients.
Why the study?
Right ventricular dysfunction is a critical predictor of adverse outcomes in cardiac surgery patients, and the predictive value of RV global longitudinal strain echocardiography needed evaluation.
Does right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RV-GLS) echocardiography accurately predict RV dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Meta-Analysis (n=583)
Does right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RV-GLS) echocardiography accurately predict RV dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Odds Ratio: 6.34 (95% CI 3.2–12.57)
RV-GLS is a highly accurate tool for predicting right ventricular dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, with an optimal cutoff identified at -15.25%.
RV GLS predicts postoperative RV dysfunction with high accuracy; supports preoperative strain use but leaves practice change open pending RCTs.
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is a critical predictor of adverse outcomes in cardiac surgery patients. The assessment of right ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) echo has emerged as a promising tool for detecting early RV dysfunction. This meta-analysis evaluates the predictive value of RV GLS in these patients. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted. The primary outcomes included pooled diagnostic performance measures, including sensitivity, specificity, and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). A multiple-cutoff model was employed to determine the optimal RV-GLS threshold. RESULTS: Ten observational studies involving 583 patients were included. RV-GLS demonstrated strong diagnostic accuracy, with a pooled area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82-1.00). The pooled DOR was 6.34 (95% CI: 3.20-12.57) with no heterogeneity (I² = 0%). Sensitivity was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.69-0.86; I² = 57.2%) and specificity was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.84; I² = 20.8%). The risk of publication bias was low (LFK index = 0.6). A multiple-threshold model identified - 15.25% as the optimal RV-GLS cutoff, achieving balanced sensitivity and specificity of 0.7423. CONCLUSIONS: RV-GLS demonstrates excellent predictive value for RV dysfunction in cardiac surgery patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Shammari et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in cardiac surgery (n=583). Right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RV-GLS) was evaluated on pooled diagnostic performance measures, including sensitivity, specificity, and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) (DOR 6.34, 95% CI 3.20-12.57). Right ventricular global longitudinal strain demonstrated strong diagnostic accuracy for detecting RV dysfunction in cardiac surgery patients, with a pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 6.34 (95% CI 3.20-12.57).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: