Key result
Preoperative DAPT is not associated with increased bleeding or transfusions in robotic coronary surgery.
Why the study?
Patients undergoing coronary surgery often receive preoperative dual antiplatelet therapy, but its impact on bleeding and transfusion in robotic-assisted coronary surgery is unclear.
Does preoperative dual antiplatelet therapy increase perioperative bleeding and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing robotic-assisted coronary surgery?
Cohort (n=110)
No
Does preoperative dual antiplatelet therapy increase perioperative bleeding and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing robotic-assisted coronary surgery?
Continuing preoperative dual antiplatelet therapy appears safe and does not significantly increase bleeding or transfusion needs in patients undergoing robotic-assisted coronary surgery.
Supports continuing preoperative dual antiplatelet therapy in robotic-assisted coronary surgery; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: Patients who present for coronary surgery often receive preoperative dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine derivative (clopidogrel or prasugrel), especially after a recent acute coronary syndrome. Studies have shown that patients on aspirin and clopidogrel are at increased risk for perioperative bleeding and related events. We sought to examine the impact of dual antiplatelet therapy on bleeding and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing robotic-assisted minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: From January 2010 to November 2011, a total of 110 patients underwent robotic-assisted off-pump coronary surgery at our institution. All patients underwent robotic-assisted harvest of the left internal mammary artery from the chest wall. Some patients then underwent direct coronary anastomosis to the left anterior descending coronary artery via a left minithoracotomy, whereas others had a complete robotic endoscopic procedure within the closed chest. The patients were divided into two groups for outcome analysis on the basis of preoperative antiplatelet therapy: group 1 (either aspirin alone or no antiplatelet agents at all; n = 53) and group 2 (aspirin plus clopidogrel or prasugrel; n = 57). RESULTS: Perioperative chest tube drainage was not significantly different between the patient groups, irrespective of the preoperative antiplatelet agents used. Transfusion requirements and other morbidities were also similar in both groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative dual antiplatelet therapy does not result in significantly increased bleeding or perioperative transfusion requirements. If clinically indicated, it is reasonable to continue preoperative combination antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing robotic-assisted coronary surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hemli et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Robotic-assisted coronary artery surgery (n=110). Preoperative dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel or prasugrel) vs. Aspirin alone or no antiplatelet agents was evaluated on Perioperative chest tube drainage and transfusion requirements. Preoperative dual antiplatelet therapy did not significantly increase perioperative chest tube drainage or transfusion requirements in patients undergoing robotic-assisted coronary surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: