Key result
ICDs remain the only effective strategy to prevent SCD in ARVC.
Why the study?
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy has evolving phenotypes and risk stratification tools that require further validation for clinical management.
This review summarizes the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, highlighting the role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in preventing sudden cardiac death.
Reinforces ICD-centric SCD prevention in ARVC; leaves open targeted therapies to modify disease progression.
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy is a myocardial disease generally caused by desmosomal mutations and characterized by progressive replacement of cardiomyocites with fibro-adipose tissue. In the classic form of the disease right ventricle is predominantly affected. However, biventricular and left-dominant variants have been recently recognized, leading to the new nosological definition of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. The condition affects mostly young adults and athletes and is clinically characterized by ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure and sudden cardiac death. The diagnosis is based on clinical-instrumental criteria, including family history, morpho-functional and electrocardiographic abnormalities, ventricular arrhythmias and genetic defects (Task Force Criteria, 2010). The main goal in the management of patients is the prevention of sudden cardiac death, where implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is the only effective therapeutic strategy. Many arrhythmic risk factors have been described. Recently, an on-line calculator has been proposed, but it needs further validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sinagra et al. (2020) conducted a review in Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy is a progressive myocardial disease where implantable cardioverter-defibrillators remain the only effective strategy to prevent sudden cardiac death.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: