Key result
Radioisotope photoscanning aids in differentiating cardiac dilatation from pericardial effusion.
Why the study?
Differentiation of cardiac dilatation from pericardial effusion was not certain by clinical means in some patients, motivating evaluation of radioisotope scanning.
Does an automatic photoscanning technique (radioisotope scanning) improve the differentiation of cardiac dilatation from pericardial effusion in patients with uncertain clinical diagnosis?
Population
40 patients with uncertain differentiation of cardiac dilatation from pericardial effusion
Comparison
Radioisotope scanning vs clinical differentiation
Design
Observational case series using automatic photoscanning technique
Authors
Loading...
May aid differentiation of effusion from dilatation in uncertain cases; leaves open validation against modern imaging.
Observational (n=40)
No
Does an automatic photoscanning technique (radioisotope scanning) improve the differentiation of cardiac dilatation from pericardial effusion in patients with uncertain clinical diagnosis?
An automatic photoscanning technique using radioisotopes was applied to differentiate cardiac dilatation from pericardial effusion in patients with uncertain clinical diagnoses.
Henry N. Wagner (1961) conducted an observational in Pericardial effusion vs cardiac dilatation (n=40). Radioisotope scanning was evaluated. Radioisotope scanning was evaluated for differentiating cardiac dilatation from pericardial effusion in 40 patients, though quantitative results are not reported in the truncated abstract.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: