Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dilutions of faecal samples spiked with Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 were analysed using immunomagnetic separation (IMS) followed by PCR. In 10% faecal dilutions with added Y. enterocolitica cells, the limit of detection was 200 cells g-1 faeces. Faecal samples from 38 pigs were analysed by IMS-PCR in parallel with detection and quantification of Y. enterocolitica O:3 using cold pre-enrichment culturing. Of the 15 culture-positive samples, only two were detected with IMS-PCR. These two samples contained 40-400 Y. enterocolitica O:3 cells g-1 faeces; the highest level found in the investigation. This indicated that the low sensitivity of IMS-PCR was due to low amounts of cells in the faecal samples. Swab samples from 195 pig tonsils, taken on a slaughterline were examined using IMS-PCR and culture detection. Of 164 culture-positive samples, 60 were positive with IMS-PCR. In addition, IMS-PCR was positive for three culture-negative samples. Forty-five of the samples were further examined by IMS-PCR after 7-10 d of cold pre-enrichment. All 31 culture-positive samples as well as five culture-negative samples were detected by IMS-PCR. From these data it can be concluded that IMS-PCR can be used to detect Y. enterocolitica O:3 cells after pre-enrichment, but direct detection needs further optimization of the sample preparation procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rasmussen et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: