Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The laminar flame speed ( s L ) is a fundamental property for characterizing combustible mixtures. The flame-angle method enables rapid screening of s L across wide ranges of mixtures and operating conditions, but its conventional form is known for limited accuracy and it requires well-controlled experimental configurations. This work develops and evaluates a deep-learning method for analyzing the variation of s L across wide variations of operating parameters, so-called s L landscapes, from measured images of non-idealized conical flames. For demonstration of the capability of this approach, the model is trained on a kinetically consistent reference scale derived from 1D simulations. A convolutional neural network (CNN) is used to learn image-based correlations between burner-specific flame morphologies and this reference scale, providing an automated high-throughput alternative to manual geometric flame-angle evaluation. An image dataset of 1378 unique C 1 –C 3 hydrocarbon/air flames was acquired under systematic variation of the equivalence ratio ( ϕ ), unburned gas temperature ( T u ), and gas exit velocity ( v e ). An image-only model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.52 cm/s ( R 2 = 0.994 ) on a held-out test set relative to the kinetic reference scale, significantly outperforming the conventional flame-angle method (MAE of 4.55 cm/s, R 2 = 0.779 ). A hybrid model (CNN + multilayer perceptron (MLP)) further reduced the MAE to 0.37 cm/s ( R 2 = 0.998 ). A generalization study showed that including 5% of data from initially held-out fuels during training acts as a necessary calibration step, yielding accurate reference-scale estimates for these held-out fuels (MAE of 1.03 cm/s). The proposed approach enables automated, high-throughput evaluation of flame propagation on simple burners where classical methods can reach their limits. Furthermore, it lays the groundwork for calibrated image-based inference of relative flame-speed variations in systems involving additives or particles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Müller et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: