Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Co-firing methane with ammonia can decarbonize high temperature industrial processes, yet the fuel-bound nitrogen in NH 3 introduces a substantial NO X penalty under pre-blended operation. This study examines ammonia lancing, the separate injection of NH 3 into the plume of an established methane flame, in a pilot-scale furnace with a commercial burner. The ammonia fuel fraction ( x NH3 = 0 to 0.38) and axial injection position (L/D b = 0 to 2) were varied at a fixed thermal input of 76 kW and an equivalence ratio of 0.95, with pre-blending as the baseline. Lancing produced a two-zone flame structure, with a methane swirl core anchored at the burner exit and a downstream ammonia reaction zone formed by two opposed jet flames from lances angled at 45° toward the furnace axis. At x NH3 = 0.19, where the pre-blend NO X peaks, lancing reduced NO X by 60, 73, and 88% at L/D b = 0, 0.6, and ≥ 1.5, respectively, with the same position dependence at the other blending ratios. The reduction was accompanied by increases in N 2 O and CO, which were largest at L/D b ≥ 1.5 and the highest ammonia fractions, where N 2 O reached approximately twice the pre-blend value and CO exceeded 1000 ppm. A firing rate sweep at L/D b = 1.5 and x NH3 = 0.28 showed that N 2 O fell by 32% as the near burner temperature rose by 61 K, while NO increased but stayed nearly a factor of 8 below the pre-blend value. Ammonia slip remained below the FTIR detection limit of approximately 1.5 ppm for x NH3 ≤ 0.28 and became significant only at x NH3 = 0.38. A favorable operating window was identified at L/D b ≤ 0.6 with x NH3 ≤ 0.28, in which NO X is reduced by 60 to 73% and the total greenhouse gas emissions remain close to the pure methane baseline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: