Key result
Admission SOFA score strongly predicts 30-day ADHF mortality, outperforming GWTG-HF and ADHERE scores with ~0.90 AUC.
Why the study?
Several studies demonstrated that the SOFA score can identify short-term mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure, but its prognostic value and ability to predict 30-day readmission require further assessment.
Does the admission SOFA score accurately predict 30-day mortality and readmission in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure compared to GWTG-HF and ADHERE scores?
Cohort (n=216)
No
Does the admission SOFA score accurately predict 30-day mortality and readmission in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure compared to GWTG-HF and ADHERE scores?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.897 (95% CI 0.830-0.964)
The admission SOFA score is a highly accurate predictor of 30-day mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure, outperforming established heart failure-specific risk scores.
May support SOFA for mortality stratification in ADHF admissions; hypothesis-generating versus GWTG-HF/ADHERE, requiring prospective validation.
Background: Data on the use of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) in patients with cardiovascular disease are increasing. Several studies demonstrated that the SOFA score can identify short-term mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). This study was conducted to determine the prognostic value of the admission SOFA score in patients hospitalized for ADHF and to assess its ability in predicting the 30-day readmission rate. Materials and methods: This study was conducted from July 2022 to August 2023 at our institution. A total of 216 patients were included in the study, and the SOFA score was calculated for all patients. Results: The average SOFA score is 3.14 ± 2.67, of which SOFA scores of ≤1, 2-3, and ≥4 account for 34.3%, 27.8%, and 37.9% of the total score, respectively. During the 30-day follow-up period, there were 22 cases of death from all causes (10.2%), of which in-hospital mortality accounted for 9.7%. Patients with all-cause mortality had higher SOFA scores than the survivors (7.32 ± 2.93 and 2.66 ± 2.12, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the SOFA score is 0.897 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.830-0.964] for 30-day mortality. The SOFA score was also compared with other validated risk scores, namely, the Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) risk score and the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) score. In this study cohort, the SOFA score demonstrates superior predictive accuracy to the GWTG-HF and ADHERE scores [the AUCs when predicting 30-day mortality are 0.769 (95% CI = 0.676-0.862) and 0.789 (95% CI = 0.705-0.873), respectively]. Conclusion: The SOFA score might be used to screen high-risk patients for optimization strategy in the treatment of ADHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoang et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Acute decompensated heart failure (n=216). Admission SOFA score vs. GWTG-HF and ADHERE scores was evaluated on 30-day mortality (AUC 0.897, 95% CI 0.830-0.964). The admission SOFA score accurately predicted 30-day mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (AUC 0.897; 95% CI 0.830-0.964), outperforming GWTG-HF and ADHERE scores.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: