Key result
Septal perforator coil embolization linked to ~74% reduction in LVOT gradient in symptomatic HOCM.
Why the study?
The long-term effect of coil embolization therapy in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy is not well defined.
Does coil embolization of the septal perforator improve LVOT gradient and symptoms in patients with symptomatic HOCM?
Observational (n=24)
No
Does coil embolization of the septal perforator improve LVOT gradient and symptoms in patients with symptomatic HOCM?
Coil embolization of the septal perforator is a safe and effective alternative for septal ablation in symptomatic HOCM, significantly reducing LVOT gradient and improving NYHA functional class.
Hypothesis-generating for coil embolization in symptomatic HOCM; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate safety, efficacy, and durability of coil embolization of the major septal perforator of the left anterior descending coronary artery in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). BACKGROUND: The long-term effect of coil embolization therapy in HOCM patients is not well defined. METHODS: We evaluated 24 symptomatic HOCM patients in a single center who underwent coil embolization of the septal perforator artery(ies). RESULTS: Twenty-four patients on optimal medical therapy presented with NYHA functional class III (75%) or IV (25%) underwent the procedure. The procedure was successful in 22 patients, with significant reduction in left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient. The functional class significantly improved to class I (54.2%) or II (41.7%) (P < = 0.01). The LVOT gradient was significantly lower during follow up echocardiography (21.3 ± 19 vs. 81.3 ± 41 mm Hg; P < = 0.01). Interventricular septal thickness decreased over time (16.3 ± 3 vs. 18.5 ± 2 mm, P< = 0.01). The procedure was aborted in one of the patients after the third coil prolapsed from the septal perforator in to the left anterior descending artery. The coil was effectively snared out. Three patients required additional coil placement in the second major septal perforator. New permanent pacemaker placement was required in one patient. However, three patients underwent ICD implantation at follow up due to ventricular arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the use of coil embolization for septal ablation is safe, effective, and durable in patients with symptomatic HOCM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guerrero et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) (n=24). Coil embolization of the septal perforator was evaluated on Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient (p=<=0.01). Coil embolization of the septal perforator significantly reduced the left ventricular outflow tract gradient from 81.3 to 21.3 mm Hg (P<=0.01) in patients with symptomatic HOCM.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: