Key result
High baseline RAA dominant frequency is linked to ~11-fold higher procedural failure in persistent AF ablation.
Why the study?
The role of dominant frequency in tracking the efficiency of stepwise catheter ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation remains poorly studied.
Does intraprocedural dominant frequency predict ablation outcome in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=40)
No
Does intraprocedural dominant frequency predict ablation outcome in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Odds Ratio: 10.9 (95% CI 2.3–53.6)
p-value: p=0.003
High baseline dominant frequency and lack of early reduction in left atrial appendage dominant frequency following pulmonary vein isolation predict procedural failure and long-term recurrence in persistent atrial fibrillation ablation.
Monitoring intraprocedural DF may aid outcome prediction after step-CA in peAF; leaves open whether DF-guided ablation improves long-term success.
Background: The role of dominant frequency (DF) in tracking the efficiency of a stepwise catheter ablation (step-CA) in persistent atrial fibrillation (peAF) remains poorly studied. We hypothesized that the DF time-course during step-CA displays divergent patterns between patients in whom a step-CA successfully restores long-term sinus rhythm (SR) and those with recurrence. Methods: This study involved 40 consecutive patients who underwent a step-CA for peAF (sustained duration 19 ± 11 months). Dominant frequency was computed on electrograms recorded from the right and left atrial appendages (RAA; LAA) and the coronary sinus before and during the step-CA synchronously to the 12-lead ECG. Dominant frequency was defined as the highest peak within the power spectrum. Results: Persistent atrial fibrillation was terminated by a step-CA in 28 patients [left-terminated (LT)], whereas 12 patients remaining in AF after ablation [not left-terminated (NLT)] were cardioverted. Over a mean follow-up of 34 ± 14 months, all NLT patients had a recurrence. Among the 28 LT patients, 20 had a recurrence, while 8 remained in SR throughout follow-up. The RAA and V1 DF had the best predictive values of the procedural failure to terminate AF (area under the curve; AUC 0.84, p < 0.05). A decision tree model including a decrease in LAA DF ≥ 6.61% during the first 20 min following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and a baseline RAA DF <5.6 Hz predicted long-term SR restoration with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 93% (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study found that high baseline DF values are predictive of unfavorable ablation outcomes. The reduction of the LAA DF at early ablation steps following PVI is associated with procedural AF termination and long-term SR maintenance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pithon et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (n=40). High baseline right atrial appendage dominant frequency (≥5.92 Hz) vs. Lower baseline right atrial appendage dominant frequency (<5.92 Hz) was evaluated on Procedural failure to terminate atrial fibrillation (OR 10.9, 95% CI 2.3-53.6, p=0.003). High baseline dominant frequency in the right atrial appendage strongly predicted procedural failure to terminate persistent atrial fibrillation during stepwise catheter ablation (OR 10.9).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: