Key result
Subcutaneous LMWH matches IV heparin efficacy for treating DVT and submassive PE.
Why the study?
Anticoagulant therapy with intravenous unfractionated heparin or subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin followed by oral anticoagulants is the treatment of choice for acute pulmonary embolism, but optimal administration protocols and comparative effectiveness require clarification.
Is subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin as effective as intravenous unfractionated heparin for the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism and deep-vein thrombosis?
Is subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin as effective as intravenous unfractionated heparin for the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism and deep-vein thrombosis?
Low molecular weight heparin is as effective as intravenous unfractionated heparin for treating deep-vein thrombosis and submassive pulmonary embolism, enabling outpatient treatment for uncomplicated cases.
May enable outpatient care for uncomplicated DVT and submassive PE; leaves open confirmation by large RCTs.
Pulmonary embolism occurs in more than 175,000 patients each year in the United States. The objectives of treatment are to prevent death from the existing embolus, to prevent death and morbidity from recurrent pulmonary embolism, and to prevent morbidity from recurrent deep-vein thrombosis. For patients with adequate cardiorespiratory reserve, the primary objective is to prevent recurrent pulmonary embolism. Anticoagulant therapy with intravenous unfractionated heparin or subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin followed by oral anticoagulant treatment for at least 3 months is the treatment of choice for most of these patients. Clinical trials indicate that the effectiveness of intravenous heparin depends on achieving an adequate heparin effect (activated partial thromboplastin time above lower limit) during the initial 24 hours. A validated protocol for intravenous heparin should be used to lessen the likelihood of delayed heparinization. Low molecular weight heparin given subcutaneously either once or twice daily is as effective as intravenous heparin for the treatment of patients with deep-vein thrombosis and submassive pulmonary embolism. Low molecular weight heparin enables many patients with uncomplicated deep-vein thrombosis to be treated in an outpatient setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gary E. Raskob (1999) conducted a review in Acute pulmonary embolism. Low molecular weight heparin vs. Intravenous unfractionated heparin was evaluated. Low molecular weight heparin given subcutaneously is as effective as intravenous heparin for the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis and submassive pulmonary embolism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: