Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Typhoid fever burdens low- and middle-income countries, especially children. Despite being curable, it now resists first-line antibiotics. This study aims to understand antimicrobial resistance patterns associated with multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) typhoid fever cases in Pakistan. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of blood culture–confirmed typhoid cases from 5 large laboratory networks in Pakistan over a period of 3 years (2017–2019). Data were analyzed for 464 956 blood culture specimens, of which Typhi and Paratyphi were isolated in 23 924 (5%) of all blood cultures done. Results Sindh had the highest proportion of S. Typhi cases (72%) of all positive cases, followed by Punjab with 46.9%. The 5–14-years age group had the highest proportion of S. Typhi (MDR: 46.1%; XDR: 44.2%), followed by the 2–4-years age group (MDR: 27%; XDR: 26.2%). XDR isolates of S. Typhi were found in 57%. Most S. Typhi isolates were resistant to ampicillin (79.8%), chloramphenicol (80.8%), cefixime (64.6%), ciprofloxacin (66.4%), ceftriaxone (63.3%), and co-trimoxazole (80.2%). Most S. Paratyphi isolates were responsive to antibiotics, ampicillin (97.2%), chloramphenicol (98.6%), cefixime (99.5%), ceftriaxone (99.5%), and co-trimoxazole (98.7%). Resistance to ciprofloxacin was 85.9%. Both S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi were susceptible to azithromycin and imipenem, whereas 99.8% of S. Typhi and 100% of S. Paratyphi were sensitive to meropenem. Conclusions Increased prevalence of culture-confirmed XDR S. Typhi cases was observed in 2019 as compared with 2017, presumably due to the outbreak of XDR in Sindh.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qamar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: