Key result
Prasugrel achieves superior platelet inhibition over clopidogrel regardless of common CYP2C19, ABCB1, or PON1 polymorphisms.
Why the study?
Clopidogrel response varies with genetic polymorphisms, but the impact of CYP2C19, PON1, and ABCB1 variants on prasugrel pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics is unclear.
Does prasugrel provide greater platelet inhibition and active metabolite generation compared to clopidogrel regardless of CYP2C19, ABCB1, and PON1 polymorphisms in aspirin-treated patients with coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=194)
randomized
Yes
Does prasugrel provide greater platelet inhibition and active metabolite generation compared to clopidogrel regardless of CYP2C19, ABCB1, and PON1 polymorphisms in aspirin-treated patients with coronary artery disease?
Prasugrel provides more consistent and potent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel, overcoming the reduced response associated with CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms.
CYP2C19 variants impair clopidogrel but not prasugrel PD/PK; supports prasugrel preference irrespective of genotype while leaving clinical outcome impact open.
Clopidogrel response varies according to the presence of genetic polymorphisms. The CYP2C19*2 allele has been associated with impaired response; conflicting results have been reported for CYP2C19*17, ABCB1, and PON1 genotypes. We assessed the impact of CYP2C19, PON1, and ABCB1 polymorphisms on clopidogrel and prasugrel pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Aspirin-treated patients (N=194) with coronary artery disease from two independent, prospective, randomised, multi-centre studies comparing clopidogrel (75 mg) and prasugrel (10 mg) were genotyped and classified by predicted CYP2C19 metaboliser phenotype (ultra metabolisers [UM] = *17 carriers; extensive metabolisers [EM] = *1/1 homozygotes; reduced metabolisers [RM] = *2 carriers). ABCB1 T/T and C/T polymorphisms and PON1 A/A, A/G and G/G polymorphisms were also genotyped. PD parameters were assessed using VerifyNow® P2Y12 and vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) expressed as platelet reactivity index (PRI) after 14 days of maintenance dosing. Clopidogrel and prasugrel active metabolite (AM) exposure was calculated in a cohort of 96 patients. For clopidogrel, genetic variants in CYP2C19, but not ABCB1 or PON1, affected PK and PD. For prasugrel, none of the measured genetic variants affected PK or PD. Compared with clopidogrel, platelet inhibition with prasugrel was greater even in the CYP2C19 UM phenotype. Prasugrel generated more AM and achieved greater platelet inhibition than clopidogrel irrespective of CYP2C19, ABCB1, and PON1 polymorphisms. The lack of effect from genetic variants on prasugrel AM generation or antiplatelet activity is consistent with previous studies in healthy volunteers and is consistent with improved efficacy in acute coronary syndrome patients managed with percutaneous coronary intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angiolillo et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in coronary artery disease (n=194). Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel (75 mg) was evaluated on Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters (platelet reactivity index and active metabolite exposure). Prasugrel generated more active metabolite and achieved greater platelet inhibition than clopidogrel irrespective of CYP2C19, ABCB1, and PON1 polymorphisms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: