Key result
Therapeutic virtual reality immersion cuts state anxiety scores ~14% while enhancing brain-to-heart connectivity.
Why the study?
Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying treatment responsiveness in state anxiety remain unclear, and objective biomarkers for therapeutic efficacy are needed.
Does a therapeutic intervention combining virtual-reality immersion, hypnotic script, and a breath control exercise reduce state anxiety and alter brain-heart connectivity in participants with real-life state anxiety?
RCT (n=27)
Randomized crossover
No
Does a therapeutic intervention combining virtual-reality immersion, hypnotic script, and a breath control exercise reduce state anxiety and alter brain-heart connectivity in participants with real-life state anxiety?
Absolute Event Rate: 27.7% vs 32.1%
p-value: p=0.023
Increased cognitive regulation of brain-to-heart connectivity and elevated midline beta power may serve as objective biomarkers for the therapeutic efficacy of non-pharmacological anxiety interventions.
May support HRV/EEG biomarkers for anxiety treatment response; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
State anxiety involves transient feelings of tension and nervousness in response to threats, which can escalate into anxiety disorders if persistent. Despite treatments, 30%-50% of individuals show limited improvement, and neurophysiological mechanisms of treatment responsiveness remain unclear, requiring the development of objective biomarkers. In this study, we monitored multimodal electrophysiological parameters: heart rate variability (high-frequency, low-frequency, LF/HF ratio), EEG beta and alpha relative power, and brain-to-heart connectivity in participants with real-life state anxiety. Participants underwent a therapeutic intervention combining virtual-reality immersion, hypnotic script, and a breath control exercise. Real-life state anxiety was captured using the STAI-Y1 scale before and after the intervention. We observed reduced anxiety immediately after the intervention in 16 out of 27 participants. While all participants, independently of their STAI-Y1 score, showed increased HRV low frequency power, only treatment-responders displayed increased overall autonomic tone (high and low frequency HRV), increased midline beta power and brain-to-heart connectivity. Notably, the LF/HF ratio showed a significant linear relationship with anxiety reduction, with higher ratios linked to greater therapeutic response. These findings suggest that increased cognitive regulation of brain-to-heart connectivity could serve as a biomarker for therapeutic efficacy, with elevated midline beta power facilitating improved cardiac tone in responders. Significance Statement Elevated state anxiety can escalate into debilitating disorders, such as generalized anxiety disorder, yet treatment efficacy remains inconsistent, and reliable biomarkers predicting therapeutic outcomes are lacking. This study identifies key neural and physiological markers linked to effective anxiety reduction following a virtual reality-based non-pharmacological intervention in healthy participants with increased state anxiety. Anxiety reduction is associated with increased midline beta power, heightened heart rate variability (LF/HF ratio), and enhanced brain-to-heart connectivity. These findings highlight the role of brain-to-heart modulation and autonomic nervous system functioning in therapeutic response. By highlighting these biomarkers, this research aims at advancing our understanding of anxiety treatment mechanisms and offering insights into the development of biomarker-driven, scalable interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sezer et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in State anxiety (n=27). Therapeutic virtual reality immersion (Zen Garden) vs. Control neutral video (American cities) was evaluated on State anxiety score (STAI-Y1) (p=0.023). Therapeutic virtual reality immersion significantly reduced state anxiety scores (27.7 vs 32.1, p=0.023) and enhanced brain-to-heart connectivity in responsive individuals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: