Key result
Arm elevation during adenosine administration fails to improve PSVT termination over standard delivery.
Why the study?
There is no official recommended method of intravenous adenosine administration for treating paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT).
Does an alternative method of adenosine administration with arm elevation improve the success rate of PSVT termination in stable adult patients?
RCT (n=30)
Open-label
Block randomization
No
Does an alternative method of adenosine administration with arm elevation improve the success rate of PSVT termination in stable adult patients?
An alternative method of adenosine administration involving arm elevation did not significantly improve the success rate of PSVT termination compared to the standard double syringe technique.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Standard adenosine technique suffices for PSVT; pilot data leave open any incremental benefit from arm elevation.
BACKGROUND: Intravenous adenosine is the recommended treatment for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). There is no official recommended method of giving adenosine. We compared the success rates between a standard and alternative method of first dose intravenous adenosine in PSVT. METHODS: A pilot parallel randomized controlled study was conducted in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital. Eligible patients were stable PSVT adult patients. We used block randomization and divided them into two groups, the standard method (double syringe technique of 6 mg of adenosine), and the alternative method (similar to the standard method, then immediately followed by elevating the arm to 90° perpendicular to a horizontal plane for 10 s). The primary outcome was the success rate of electrocardiogram (ECG) response which demonstrated termination of PSVT (at least two-fold of the RR-interval widening or sinus rhythm conversion). Secondary outcomes were complications within one minute after the injection. RESULTS: We allocated 15 patients in each group and analyzed them as intention-to-treat. The success rate was 86.7% in the alternative group and 80% in the standard group (risk difference 6.7%, 95% confidence interval - 19.9 to 33.2%, P 1.00). Complications within one minute after adenosine injection were also similar in both groups, 14 of 15 patients (93%) in each group had no complications, without significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence of the difference between alternative and standard methods occurred, in terms of the success rate of ECG response and complications within one minute after adenosine injection. The standard method of adenosine injection is a safe, easy-to-administer, and widely available treatment for PSVT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TCTR20200609001.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daengbubpha et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) (n=30). Alternative method of intravenous adenosine (arm elevation) vs. Standard method of intravenous adenosine was evaluated on Successful termination of PSVT determined by ECG response (Risk difference 6.7%, 95% CI -19.9 to 33.2, p=1.00). An alternative method of adenosine administration involving arm elevation did not significantly increase the successful termination of stable PSVT compared to the standard method (86.7% vs 80.0%, risk difference 6.7%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: