Key result
Reducing microvessel density and permeability significantly shrinks intraplaque hemorrhage area in computational modeling.
Why the study?
Neovascularization from the adventitial vasa vasorum and intraplaque hemorrhage are critical indicators in vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque development, but their quantitative influences remain unclear.
A mathematical model demonstrates that high microvessel density and leaky neovasculature walls are key contributors to intraplaque hemorrhage in vulnerable carotid plaques.
Model quantifies neovascularization effects on plaque vulnerability; hypothesis-generating and requires validation before any clinical consideration.
BACKGROUND: Growing experimental evidence has identified neovascularization from the adventitial vasa vasorum and induced intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) as critical indicators during the development of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques. In this study, we propose a mathematical model incorporating intraplaque angiogenesis and hemodynamic calculation of the microcirculation, to obtain the quantitative evaluation of the influences of intraplaque neovascularization and hemorrhage on vulnerable plaque development. A two-dimensional nine-point model of angiogenic microvasculature is generated based on the histology of a patient's carotid plaque. The intraplaque angiogenesis model includes three key cells (endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and macrophages) and three key chemical factors (vascular endothelial growth factors, extracellular matrix, and matrix metalloproteinase), which densities and concentrations are described by a series of reaction-diffusion equations. The hemodynamic calculation by coupling the intravascular blood flow, the extravascular plasma flow, and the transvascular transport is carried out on the generated angiogenic microvessel network. We then define the IPH area by using the plasma concentration in the interstitial tissue, as well as the extravascular transport across the capillary wall. RESULTS: The simulational results reproduce a series of pathophysiological phenomena during the atherosclerotic plaque progression. It is found that the high microvessel density region at the shoulder areas and the extravascular flow across the leaky wall of the neovasculature contribute to the IPH observed widely in vulnerable plaques. The simulational results are validated by both the in vivo MR imaging data and in vitro experimental observations and show significant consistency in quantity ground. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis of model parameters reveals that the IPH area and extent can be reduced significantly by decreasing the MVD and the wall permeability of the neovasculature. CONCLUSIONS: The current quantitative model could help us to better understand the roles of microvascular and intraplaque hemorrhage during the carotid plaque progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2021) studied Carotid atherosclerotic plaque (n=1). Microvessel density and wall permeability was evaluated on Intraplaque hemorrhage area. Mathematical modeling demonstrated that the intraplaque hemorrhage area and extent can be reduced significantly by decreasing the microvessel density and the wall permeability of the neovasculature.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: