Key result
Resting mPAP 21-24 mmHg is linked to ~7-fold higher exercise pulmonary hypertension risk.
Why the study?
A resting mPAP of 21-24 mmHg is above normal but does not meet pulmonary hypertension criteria, and its association with abnormal exercise pulmonary vascular response is unclear.
Does a resting mPAP of 21-24 mmHg predict an abnormal pulmonary vascular response during exercise in patients with resting mPAP <25 mmHg?
Observational (n=290)
Does a resting mPAP of 21-24 mmHg predict an abnormal pulmonary vascular response during exercise in patients with resting mPAP <25 mmHg?
Odds Ratio: 6.9 (95% CI 3.6–13.6)
Absolute Event Rate: 86% vs 47.1%
p-value: p=<0.0001
A resting mPAP of 21-24 mmHg, while below the traditional threshold for pulmonary hypertension, strongly predicts abnormal exercise haemodynamics and is associated with worse functional capacity.
Borderline resting mPAP may warrant exercise hemodynamics in at-risk patients; leaves open whether this refines PH thresholds or improves outcomes.
A resting mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) of 21-24 mmHg is above the upper limit of normal but does not reach criteria for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH). We sought to determine whether an mPAP of 21-24 mmHg is associated with an increased risk of developing an abnormal pulmonary vascular response during exercise.Consecutive patients (n=290) with resting mPAP <25 mmHg who underwent invasive exercise haemodynamics were analysed. Risk factors for pulmonary vascular disease or left heart disease were present in 63.4% and 43.8% of subjects. An abnormal pulmonary vascular response (or exercise PH) was defined by mPAP >30 mmHg and total pulmonary vascular resistance >3 WU at maximal exercise.Exercise PH occurred in 74 (86.0%) out of 86 versus 96 (47.1%) out of 204 in the mPAP of 21-24 mmHg and mPAP <21 mmHg groups, respectively (OR 6.9, 95% CI: 3.6-13.6; p<0.0001). Patients with mPAP of 21-24 mmHg had lower 6-min walk distance (p=0.002) and higher New York Heart Association functional class status (p=0.03). Decreasing levels of mPAP were associated with a lower prevalence of exercise PH, which occurred in 60.3%, 38.7% and 7.7% of patients with mPAP of 17-20, 13-16 and <13 mmHg, respectively.In an at-risk population, a resting mPAP between 21-24 mmHg is closely associated with exercise PH together with worse functional capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lau et al. (2016) conducted an observational in At risk for pulmonary vascular disease or left heart disease (n=290). Resting mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) of 21-24 mmHg vs. Resting mPAP <21 mmHg was evaluated on Abnormal pulmonary vascular response (exercise PH) defined by mPAP >30 mmHg and total pulmonary vascular resistance >3 WU at maximal exercise (OR 6.9, 95% CI 3.6-13.6, p=<0.0001). A resting mPAP of 21-24 mmHg was associated with a significantly higher risk of exercise pulmonary hypertension compared to mPAP <21 mmHg (86.0% vs 47.1%; OR 6.9, 95% CI 3.6-13.6; p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: