Key result
Impaired renal function linked to ~113% higher 1-year MACE risk after PCI for ACS.
Why the study?
The clinical impact of impaired renal function in real-world ACS patients receiving clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor undergoing PCI was not well characterized.
Does impaired renal function increase the risk of MACE and bleeding in ACS patients undergoing PCI and receiving contemporary antiplatelet therapy?
Cohort (n=2,047)
Yes
Does impaired renal function increase the risk of MACE and bleeding in ACS patients undergoing PCI and receiving contemporary antiplatelet therapy?
In real-world ACS patients undergoing PCI, impaired renal function is associated with significantly higher risks of both ischemic and bleeding events at 1 year compared to normal renal function.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical impact of impaired renal function (IRF), in "real-world" acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, receiving clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, multicenter, cohort study of ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with IRF (creatinine clearance <60 mL/min by Cockroft-Gault equation), who were recruited into the Greek Antiplatelet Registry (GRAPE). Patients were followed-up until 1 year for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, and stroke) and BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) bleeding. RESULTS: Out of 2,047 registered patients, there were 344 (16.8%) with IRF. At the 1-year follow-up, MACE occurred in 18.6 and 6.2% of those patients with and without IRF, respectively: adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 2.13 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.16-3.91), p = 0.02. IRF patients were also at higher risk of death and BARC type ≥2 and ≥3 bleeding: adjusted HR = 3.55 (95% CI 1.73-7.27), p = 0.001; HR = 2.75 (95% CI 1.13-6.68), p = 0.03; and HR = 6.02 (95% CI 2.30-15.77), p < 0.001, respectively. Combined MACE and BARC type ≥2 bleeding occurred in 34.0 and 14.0% of those with and without IRF, respectively: adjusted HR = 2.65 (95% CI 1.36-5.16), p = 0.004. At discharge, clopidogrel was more frequently prescribed in IRF patients (61.0 vs. 33.1%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world ACS patients with IRF subjected to PCI demonstrate higher thrombotic and bleeding risks than patients with normal renal function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davlouros et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (n=2,047). Impaired renal function vs. Normal renal function (without impaired renal function) was evaluated on MACE (a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, and stroke) (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.16-3.91, p=0.02). Impaired renal function in ACS patients undergoing PCI was associated with a higher risk of 1-year MACE compared to normal renal function (18.6% vs 6.2%; HR 2.13; 95% CI 1.16-3.91; p=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: