Key result
Nebivololum increased regulatory adaptive status and exercise tolerance to a greater degree than sotalolum in patients with paroxysmal SVT and essential hypertension.
Why the study?
The comparative effectiveness of nebivololum versus sotalolum in patients with paroxysmal SVT and essential hypertension considering regulatory adaptive status was unclear.
Does nebivolol improve regulatory adaptive status and exercise tolerance compared to sotalol in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and essential hypertension?
RCT (n=49)
randomized
Does nebivolol improve regulatory adaptive status and exercise tolerance compared to sotalol in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and essential hypertension?
In patients with paroxysmal SVT and essential hypertension, nebivolol may be preferable to sotalol due to greater improvements in regulatory adaptive status and exercise tolerance.
May favor nebivolol over sotalol for RAS and exercise tolerance in hypertensive SVT; leaves open confirmation in larger trials.
Objective. Compare the effectiveness of treatment with nebivololum or sotalolum in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) on a background of essential hypertension (EH) taking into account quantitative evaluation of the regulatory adaptive status (RAS). Materials and methods. 49 patients with paroxysmal SVT against the background of EH of stages II-III took part in the research, they were randomized into two groups for treatment with nebivololum (7.4±1.9 mg/day n=25) or sotalolum (162.5±46.2 mg/day n=24). As part of combination therapy, patients were administered lisinoprilum (14.4±4.4 and 14.3±4.7 mg/day), when required also atorvastatinum (15.9±4.1 mg/day, n=9 and 16.0±4.8 mg/day, n=10), acetylsalicylic acid (93.1±16.2 mg/day, n=14 и 94.1±16.5 mg/day, n=14). Initially and 6 months after therapy, the following was done: quantitative assessment of RAS (by cardio-respiratory synchronism test), echocardiography, triplex scanning of brachiocephalic arteries, treadmill test, six-minute walk test, all-day monitoring of blood pressure and electrocardiogram, subjective assessment of quality of life. Results. Both drug regimens comparably improved structural and functional condition of the heart, controlled arterial hypertension, effectively suppressed paroxysms of SVT, improved the quality of life. At the same time, the use of nebivololum increased the RAS and increased exercise tolerance to a greater degree than the use of sotalolum. Conclusion. In patients with paroxysmal SVT against the background of EH of stages II-III, the use of nebivololum as part of combination therapy may be preferable to sotalolum due to its positive impact on the RAS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nazhalkina et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and essential hypertension (EH) (n=49). Nebivololum vs. Sotalolum (162.5±46.2 mg/day) was evaluated on Quantitative evaluation of the regulatory adaptive status (RAS). Nebivololum increased regulatory adaptive status and exercise tolerance to a greater degree than sotalolum in patients with paroxysmal SVT and essential hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: