Key result
PCI and CABG successfully treat recurrent ACS in vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.
Why the study?
Coronary artery revascularization in vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is challenging due to arterial friability and the optimum treatment remains unclear.
Case Report (n=1)
Highlights the feasibility and technical considerations of performing PCI and CABG in patients with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome despite extreme vessel friability.
Supports cautious low-pressure PCI technique in vEDS; leaves open optimal revascularization strategy.
Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is a rare connective tissue disorder associated with arterial dissection or rupture. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often critical in patients with this syndrome because their coronary arteries are prone to dissection, enhancing the risk of stent borders dissection when conventional stent deployment pressures are used. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) treatment for these patients may also raise concerns because the left internal mammary artery is probably friable. Therefore, coronary artery revascularization in vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome either using PCI or CABG is challenging due to the arteries friability. A small number of cases have been published describing the friability of the vessels and associated complications; nevertheless, the optimum treatment remains unclear. We report the case of a 54-year-old woman treated successfully with PCI and CABG in two different acute coronary syndrome episodes, in which specific technical issues related to both procedures were decisive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zago et al. (2012) conducted a case report in Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (n=1). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) was evaluated. PCI and CABG successfully treated two different acute coronary syndrome episodes in a 54-year-old woman with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: