Key result
Catheter ablation cuts AF progression ~63% compared to antiarrhythmic drugs.
Why the study?
The progression of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF was not well characterized using implantable cardiac monitors.
Does catheter ablation reduce atrial fibrillation progression compared to antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=92)
randomized
Does catheter ablation reduce atrial fibrillation progression compared to antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 0.37 (95% CI 0.17–0.76)
Absolute Event Rate: 21.7% vs 58.7%
p-value: p=0.007
Catheter ablation significantly reduces the progression of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and has a lower complication rate compared to antiarrhythmic drug therapy over 24 months.
Supports early ablation over drugs to limit paroxysmal AF progression; extends RCT evidence for rhythm-control strategies.
Aim. This prospective randomized study was aimed to assess the progression of atrial fibrillation (AF) after ablation procedure and antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD) in patients with paroxysmal AF by means of implantable cardiac monitors (ICM). Methods. The study enrolled 92 patients with paroxysmal AF, who were eligible either for catheter ablation or AAD. The patients were randomized into two groups: 1) AAD + ICM implantation (group I; n=46), and 2) AF catheter ablation (CA) + ICM implantation (group II; n=46), and 2). The primary endpoint was AF progression according to ICM data. The AF progression was defined as AF burden > 30%. A complication rate after ablation procedure and side effects of AAD were determined as the secondary endpoints. The follow up of this study was 24 months. Results. By the end of the follow-up period, AF progression was observed in 27 (58.7%) patients in the AAD group and 10 (21.7%) patients in the CA group (р=0.0003; HR 0.37, 95% CI [0.17-0.76], р=0.007, Cox regression). 13 (28,3%) patients in the AAD group and 2 (4.3%) in the CA group (р=0.002) developed persistent AF. The complication rate in the AAD group was 24% (11 patients) and 6.5 % (3 patients) in the CA group (р=0.02). Conclusion. Radiofrequency ablation of AF leads to a significant decrease in AF progression when compared with antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF, which was confirmed by implantable cardiac monitors data. Received 12 July 2016. Accepted 22 August 2016. Funding: The study had no sponsorship. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simonyan et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=92). Catheter ablation vs. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD) was evaluated on AF progression (AF burden > 30%) (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.76, p=0.007). Catheter ablation significantly reduced the progression of atrial fibrillation compared to antiarrhythmic drug therapy (21.7% vs 58.7%; HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.17-0.76; P=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: