Key result
An acute bout of moderate aerobic exercise did not significantly improve interference control or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex oxygenation under psychosocial stress compared to a reading control condition.
Why the study?
Does an acute bout of aerobic exercise improve interference control and brain oxygenation under stress in male adolescents?
RCT (n=60)
Randomized
No
Does an acute bout of aerobic exercise improve interference control and brain oxygenation under stress in male adolescents?
Effect estimate: ηp2 = 0.008
p-value: p=0.517
An acute bout of aerobic exercise reduced physiological and psychological stress reactivity but did not improve interference control or DLPFC lateralization under stress in male adolescents.
Acute exercise may buffer stress effects on inhibitory control in male adolescents; leaves open DLPFC mediation and needs prospective confirmation.
Background: High psychosocial stress can impair executive function in adolescents, whereas acute exercise has been reported to benefit this cognitive domain. The aim of this study was to investigate whether an acute bout of aerobic exercise improves the inhibitory aspect of executive function and the associated dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) oxygenation when under stress. Methods: Sixty male high school students aged 16-20 years performed a Stroop task (pre-stress condition) and were randomly assigned to an exercise group (30 min on ergometer at 70% of maximum heart rate) and a control group (30 min of reading). Subsequently, all participants underwent a modified Trier Social Stress Test, which included a Stroop task under enhanced stress. The Stroop tasks in both conditions were combined with functional near-infrared spectroscopy to record the lateralized DLPFC oxygenation difference (LOD) in response to the task. Stress reactivity was measured with saliva samples (cortisol, alpha-amylase), heart rate monitoring, and anxiety scores. Results: All stress parameters indicated increases in response to the stressor (p<.001), with higher alpha-amylase (t(58)=-3.45, p=.001, d=1.93) and anxiety (t(58)=-2.04, p=.046, d=0.53) reactions in the control compared to the exercise group. Controlling for these two parameters, repeated measures analyses of covariance targeting changes in pre- and under-stress Stroop interference scores showed no main effect of stress (F(1,58)=3.80, p=.056, ηp²=.063) and no stress × group interaction (F(1,58)=0.43, p=.517, ηp²=.008). Similarly, there was no main effect of stress (F(1,58)=1.07, p=.306, ηp²=.019) and no stress × group interaction (F(1,58)=0.71, p=.403, ηp²=.013) for LOD. Conclusion: Our study confirms potentially health-enhancing effects of acute exercise on some of the physiological and psychological stress reactivity indicators. However, our data do not support the notion of an effect on interference control and DLPFC lateralization under stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mücke et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Healthy adolescents (n=60). Acute aerobic exercise vs. 30 min of reading was evaluated on Stroop interference score change under stress (ηp2 = 0.008, p=0.517). An acute bout of moderate aerobic exercise did not significantly improve interference control or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex oxygenation under psychosocial stress compared to a reading control condition.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: