Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A low-pressure carbon filter process can capture carbon dioxide from combustion flue gas. This filter is filled with a carbonaceous sorbent, such as activated carbon, which has a high chemical affinity to and hence high capacity to retain CO 2 but not nitrogen. This in turn leads to a high CO 2 /N 2 selectivity, especially at low pressures. While CO 2 sorption is spontaneous and rapid, its recovery from the sorbent is a challenge that determines the process efficiency. Among the desorption methods considered in this work, direct steam can produce nearly pure CO 2, but it results in condensed water in the bed that reduces the sorbent capacity and requires sorbent cooling, which is slow. Vacuum desorption in the absence of water also works, but it requires low pressures, much lower than 30 Torr, to achieve substantial CO 2 yields. However, a hybrid approach, referred to as “steam-aided vacuum swing adsorption” (SA-VSA), proposed in this work, is found to alleviate or eliminate these problems. Water vapor serves as a displacement medium and hence increases the vacuum efficiency at moderate pressures. Vacuum, on the other hand, prevents bulk water condensation and sorbent heating, and hence eliminates the need for cooling. As a result, SA-VSA can completely recover nearly pure CO 2 from combustion flue gas, but it also allows for optimizing the CO 2 recovery and purity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dutcher et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: