Recently, both Hagerty and Kamakura have proposed insightful suggestions for improving the predictive accuracy of conjoint analysis via various types of averaging of individual responses. Hagerty uses Q-type factor analysis (i.e., optimal weighting) and Kamakura a hierarchical cluster analysis that optimizes predictive validity. Both approaches are compared with conventional conjoint and self-explicated utility models using real datasets. Neither the Hagerty nor the Kamakura suggestions lead to higher predictive validities than are obtained by conventional conjoint analysis applied to individual response data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Green et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: