Key result
Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for colorectal surgery in a small rural hospital significantly reduced length of stay by 1.73 days compared to traditional care.
Why the study?
Does an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol reduce length of stay in patients undergoing colorectal surgery in a small rural hospital?
Cohort (n=120)
No
Does an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol reduce length of stay in patients undergoing colorectal surgery in a small rural hospital?
Mean Difference: 1.73
Absolute Event Rate: 4% vs 6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Implementation of an ERAS protocol in a small rural hospital is feasible and significantly reduces length of stay for colorectal surgery patients by approximately 1.7 days.
May support ERAS in rural colorectal surgery to shorten stays; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Background Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs include preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative clinical pathways to improve quality of patient care while reducing length of stay and readmission. This study assessed the feasibility and outcomes of an ERAS protocol for colorectal surgery implemented over two-years in a small, resource-challenged rural hospital. Study design A prospective cohort study used retrospectively matched controls to assess the effect of ERAS on LOS in patients undergoing colorectal surgery in a small rural hospital in northern Ontario, Canada. ERAS patients were matched to two patients in the control group based on diagnosis, age and gender. Patients had open or laparoscopic colorectal surgeries, with those in the intervention group treated per ERAS protocol and given instructions on pre- and post-operative self-care. Results Most ERAS patients reported adherence to ERAS protocols prior to surgery. Approximately one quarter of patients chose not to complete the postoperative survey. Of those who completed the survey, adherence to protocol was strongest for chewing gum in the days after surgery. Most patients were sitting in a chair for their afternoon meal by the first day and most were walking down the hallway by the second day. The control and ERAS patient groups did not differ significantly (p≥0.07) in age ( years, sd=13.1), gender (52% male), nor in the Canadian Classification of Health Interventions 5-character code. The control group significantly higher (p<0.001) malignant neoplasm of colon (C18, 69% vs 35%), and significantly lower malignant neoplasm of rectum (C20, 0% vs 5%), relative to the ERAS group. The control group had an average ln-transformed LOS that was significantly longer (exponentiated as 1.7 days) than ERAS patients (t-test, p<0.001). Conclusion This study found that ERAS could be implemented in a small rural hospital and provided evidence for a reduced LOS of approximately two days.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roldan et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Colorectal surgery (n=120). Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol vs. Traditional surgical care (retrospectively matched controls) was evaluated on Length of stay (LOS) (1.73 days reduction, p=<0.001). Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for colorectal surgery in a small rural hospital significantly reduced length of stay by 1.73 days compared to traditional care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: