Key result
Gene-based SVM model identifies myocardial infarction with ~87% accuracy.
Why the study?
Current diagnostic strategies for myocardial infarction have low specificity and effectiveness, necessitating an accurate gene expression-based diagnostic approach.
Can an SVM diagnostic model based on risk gene expression accurately distinguish myocardial infarction patients from normal controls?
Observational
Can an SVM diagnostic model based on risk gene expression accurately distinguish myocardial infarction patients from normal controls?
A machine-learning diagnostic model based on gene expression signatures can accurately identify early myocardial infarction and may reflect treatment response to PCI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ECG limitations in suspected MI warrant diagnostic caution; Level 5 data leave open adjunctive tool utility.
BACKGROUND: Myocardial Infarction (MI) is a fatal cardiovascular system disease. At present, the diagnosis of MI patients is mainly based on the patient's clinical manifestations, dynamic changes in electrocardiogram (ECG), and changes in myocardial enzymes. ECG is insufficient to diagnose an acute coronary syndrome or acute myocardial infarction, since ST-segment deviation might be also present in other conditions, such as acute pericarditis and early repolarization patterns. Given the low specificity and effectiveness of the current diagnostic strategies, an accurate diagnostic approach based on the level of gene expression is urgently needed in the clinic. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the gene's expression between MI patients and normal samples. The RNAseq data were downloaded from the GEO database. Differentially expressed genes underwent a feature selection process, and the signatures were selected to train a machine-learning model. In this study, we identified the risk genes associated with MI as signatures and uses the SVM to establish a diagnostic model. The accuracy of the model on discovery data is 0.87, which significantly improves the diagnostic efficiency of early detection of MI patients (MIPs). Two independent datasets were applied to verify the diagnostic model. Our model can effectively distinguish the control group from the disease group. CONCLUSIONS: We used risk genes to construct a diagnostic model for MI diagnosis, which can effectively distinguish MIPs from normal samples in the both of the discovery data and validation data. In the validation data, we found that percutaneous coronary intervention could indeed reverse MI to a certain extent, and the gene expression level of patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was closer to the normal state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Myocardial Infarction. SVM diagnostic model based on risk genes vs. Normal samples was evaluated on Accuracy of the diagnostic model on discovery data. An SVM diagnostic model based on risk genes achieved an accuracy of 0.87 in distinguishing myocardial infarction patients from normal samples.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: