Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost effectiveness to primary care trusts (PCT) in commissioning general practitioner (GP) referrals in-hours to emergency care practitioners (ECP). METHODS: A retrospective case note review for patients referred by GPs in-hours to ECP over a 4-month period to ascertain any added value over a GP visit. RESULTS: In a 4-month period 105 patients were referred. In most cases (90.5%) the ECP was utilised as a substitute for a GP rather than providing any additional skills. Defining an avoided attendance as the ECP undertaking an intervention outside a GP skill set this equated to a 9.5% avoided attendance rate compared with the ECP service standard rate of 60%. This has implications both in terms of financial benefit and ongoing ECP service sustainability. CONCLUSIONS: There is little value in a PCT commissioning this service as they will pay twice and care must be taken in accepting new referral streams into existing services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gray et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: