Key result
Conservative anticoagulant therapy for acute MI lacks reported quantitative mortality results.
Why the study?
The value of anticoagulants in the short-term treatment of acute myocardial infarction was still not settled despite widespread claims of mortality reduction.
Does conservative anticoagulant therapy improve outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Population
Patients with acute myocardial infarction
Comparison
Conservative anticoagulant therapy vs no specified comparator
Design
Other study design
Authors
Loading...
Supports conservative anticoagulation in acute MI to limit thromboembolism; leaves open mortality benefit and optimal targets in contemporary practice.
Does conservative anticoagulant therapy improve outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
An early 1962 examination of the optimal level of anticoagulant therapy in the management of acute myocardial infarction.
George C. Griffith (1962) studied Acute Myocardial Infarction. Anticoagulant therapy was evaluated on Mortality rate. The provided abstract excerpt discusses conservative anticoagulant therapy for acute myocardial infarction but does not report specific quantitative results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: