Key result
Interosseous access in infants under 1 year is linked to ~35% higher mortality than in older children.
Why the study?
Population-based studies identifying indications and complications of interosseous access by age in pediatric patients are sparse.
What are the indications, complications, and mortality rates associated with interosseous access in pediatric patients?
Cohort (n=1,012)
Yes
What are the indications, complications, and mortality rates associated with interosseous access in pediatric patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 39.2% vs 29%
p-value: p=0.0028
Interosseous access in pediatric patients has a low complication rate (2.9%) but is associated with high mortality (31.8%), particularly in infants <1 year, and may be underutilized in non-cardiac emergencies.
IO use beyond cardiac arrest may warrant earlier consideration given low complications; observational data leaves open mortality impact in infants.
Background: Interosseous (IO) usage in the pediatric population has been mostly studied in the setting of cardiac arrest. Population-based studies identifying the indications and complications associated with age, however, are sparse. Results: This was a retrospective observational cohort study utilizing the TriNetX ® electronic health record data. Thirty-seven hospitals were included in the data set with 1012 patients where an IO procedure code was reported in the emergency department or inpatient setting. The cohort was split into two groups, pediatric subjects < 1 year of age and those ≥ 1 year of age. A total incidence of IO line placement of 18 per 100,000 pediatric encounters was reported. Total mortality was 31.8%, with a higher rate of mortality seen in subjects < 1 year of age (39.2% vs 29.0%; p = 0.0028). A diagnosis of cardiac arrest was more frequent in subjects < 1 year of age (51.5% vs 38.0%; p = 0.002), and a diagnosis of convulsions was more frequent in those ≥ 1 of age (28.0% vs 13.8%; p <0.01). Overall, 29 (2.9%) subjects had at least one complication. Conclusions: More IOs were placed in subjects ≥ 1 year of age, and a higher rate of mortality was seen in subjects < 1 year of age. Lower frequencies of non-cardiac diagnoses at the time of IO placement were found in both groups, highlighting IO may be underutilized in non-cardiac settings such as convulsions, shock, and respiratory failure. Given the low rate of complications seen in both groups of our study, IO use should be considered early on for urgent vascular access, especially for children less than 1 year of age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoskins et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Pediatric emergencies requiring vascular access (n=1,012). Age < 1 year receiving interosseous access vs. Age ≥ 1 year receiving interosseous access was evaluated on Mortality (p=0.0028). Interosseous access in pediatric patients was associated with a significantly higher mortality rate in children less than 1 year of age (39.2%) compared to those 1 year or older (29.0%, p=0.0028).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: