Key result
The user-modified Cepheid Xpert Norovirus kit showed perfect concordance with a clinically validated laboratory-developed test for detecting norovirus (kappa coefficient 1.00; 95% CI 1.00-1.00).
Why the study?
Does a user-modified Cepheid Xpert Norovirus kit assay provide comparable diagnostic performance to a clinically validated laboratory-developed test in stool samples?
Observational (n=85)
Does a user-modified Cepheid Xpert Norovirus kit assay provide comparable diagnostic performance to a clinically validated laboratory-developed test in stool samples?
The user-modified Cepheid Xpert Norovirus kit assay demonstrates perfect concordance with a validated laboratory-developed test for detecting norovirus in stool samples.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The Cepheid Xpert® Norovirus kit automates sample processing, nucleic acid extraction, and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCRs) to detect norovirus genogroups I (GI) and II (GII). Eighty-five stool samples collected between February 2015 and May 2017 were used to compare the performance of a user-modified Xpert assay against a clinically validated laboratory-developed test (LDT). Of the 85 samples, 54 were previously archived in -80°C freezer. The remaining 31 were fresh samples tested concurrently with the LDT. The results of all samples tested using the Xpert kit and LDT were found to be concordant, including 12 GI- and 42 GII-positive samples, 1 GI and GII coinfection, and 30 negative samples. Comparison of the assays showed perfect concordance with a kappa coefficient score of 1.00 (95%CI from 1.00 to 1.00). Of the 30 negative stool samples tested, three samples were positive for rotavirus detected using an immunochromatographic assay, with no cross-reactivity shown in both LDT and Xpert assays. In-run sample processing control of the Xpert assay for all negative samples tested showed no/minor inhibition. Compared to the LDT, the Xpert assay produced similar or better Ct values for detection. It also showed better mitigation of PCR inhibition in stool sample testing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
User-modified Xpert assay shows perfect LDT concordance; leaves open prospective validation before routine diagnostic use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wong et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Norovirus infection (n=85). User-modified Cepheid Xpert Norovirus kit vs. Clinically validated laboratory-developed test (LDT) was evaluated on Concordance between Xpert kit and LDT (kappa coefficient 1.00, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.00). The user-modified Cepheid Xpert Norovirus kit showed perfect concordance with a clinically validated laboratory-developed test for detecting norovirus (kappa coefficient 1.00; 95% CI 1.00-1.00).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: