Key result
AV node pacing improves LVEF to 44% in heart failure with AV block.
Why the study?
Conduction system pacing has limitations in patients with anatomically complex conditions, and the feasibility and safety of atrioventricular node pacing remain unclear.
Does atrioventricular node pacing improve cardiac function and symptoms in a patient with heart failure and atrioventricular block?
Case Report (n=1)
Does atrioventricular node pacing improve cardiac function and symptoms in a patient with heart failure and atrioventricular block?
Atrioventricular node pacing may be a feasible and effective alternative for patients with heart failure and atrioventricular block who fail traditional conduction system pacing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support AV node pacing when standard approaches fail; leaves open comparative efficacy in prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: Conduction system pacing (CSP) serves as a physiological alternative for managing heart failure and atrioventricular block. CASE SUMMARY: A 77-year-old woman was admitted with worsening shortness of breath. Her diagnoses included chronic heart failure classified as NYHA functional class IV, permanent atrial fibrillation, third-degree atrioventricular block after pacemaker implantation, and rheumatic heart valve disease. Atrioventricular node pacing (AVNP) was successfully achieved, with a stable threshold of 0.75 V at 0.4 ms. Over a 2-year period, the patient's left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 26% to 44%, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter decreased from 63 to 56 mm, and NYHA functional classification improved from IV to II. DISCUSSION: AVNP may present a viable alternative for patients experiencing failure of His bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing. This case demonstrates to our knowledge the first report of AVNP with sustained electrophysiological stability and clinical efficacy during a 2-year follow-up, thereby addressing existing gaps in the applicability of CSP for patients with anatomically complex conditions. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: AVNP may provide an alternative for patients with failure of traditional CSP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Heart failure and atrioventricular block (n=1). Atrioventricular node pacing (AVNP) was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and NYHA functional classification. Atrioventricular node pacing improved left ventricular ejection fraction from 26% to 44% and NYHA class from IV to II over a 2-year follow-up in a patient with heart failure and AV block.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: