Key result
AV node ablation and pacing improves symptoms and cardiac performance in refractory HF and AF.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to review relevant literature on the use of atrioventricular node ablation and pacing in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation.
Does atrioventricular node ablation and pacing improve clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation?
Does atrioventricular node ablation and pacing improve clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation?
Atrioventricular node ablation combined with pacing (especially CRT or His bundle pacing) is an effective strategy for improving symptoms and cardiac performance in patients with AF and HF refractory to medical therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports AV node ablation-pacing for refractory AF-HF symptoms; hypothesis-generating, needing RCTs for hard outcomes.
Objective: To review the relevant literature on the use of atrioventricular node ablation and pacing in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Methods: A PubMed/MEDLINE and SCOPUS search was performed in order to assess the clinical outcomes of atrioventricular node ablation and pacemaker implantation, as well as the complications that may occur. Results: Several clinical trials, observational analyses and meta-analyses have shown that “pace and ablate” strategy not only improves symptoms but also can enhance cardiac performance in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Although this procedure is effective and safe, some complications may occur including worsening of heart failure, permanent fibrillation, arrhythmias and sudden death. Regarding the implantation of pacemaker, cardiac resynchronization therapy is shown to be the optimal choice compared to right ventricle apical pacing. His bundle pacing is a promising alternative to cardiac resynchronization therapy and has shown beneficial effects, while left bundle brunch pacing is an innovative modality. Conclusions: Atrioventricular node ablation and implantation of pacemaker is shown to have beneficial effects on clinical outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation ± heart failure who do not respond or are intolerant to medical treatment. Cardiac resynchronization therapy is the treatment of choice and His bundle pacing seems to be an effective alternative way of pacing in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koniari et al. (2023) conducted a review in Heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Atrioventricular node ablation and pacing vs. Right ventricle apical pacing or medical treatment was evaluated on Clinical outcomes and complications. Atrioventricular node ablation and pacing improves symptoms and cardiac performance in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation who are unresponsive or intolerant to medical treatment.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: