PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 26, 2023Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease14 citationsOpen Access

Outcomes of Atrioventricular Node Ablation and Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation: From Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to His Bundle Pacing

IKIoanna KoniariAGAndreas GerakarisNKNicholas G. Kounis

Key Result

Atrioventricular node ablation and pacemaker implantation improves symptoms and cardiac performance in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure unresponsive to medical treatment.

Structured PICO

Does atrioventricular node ablation and pacemaker implantation improve clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
Patients with atrial fibrillation ± heart failure who do not respond or are intolerant to medical treatment
I
Intervention
Atrioventricular node ablation and pacemaker implantation (including cardiac resynchronization therapy, His bundle pacing, or left bundle branch pacing)
C
Comparator
Right ventricle apical pacing or medical treatment
O
Outcome
Clinical outcomes, symptoms, and cardiac performance

The 'pace and ablate' strategy with CRT or His bundle pacing is an effective option for improving symptoms and cardiac performance in patients with AF and HF refractory to medical therapy.

Abstract

Objective: To review the relevant literature on the use of atrioventricular node ablation and pacing in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Methods: APubMed/MEDLINE and SCOPUS search was performed in order to assess the clinical outcomes of atrioventricular node ablation and pacemaker implantation, as well as the complications that may occur. Results: Several clinical trials, observational analyses and meta-analyses have shown that the “pace and ablate” strategy not only improves symptoms but also can enhance cardiac performance in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Although this procedure is effective and safe, some complications may occur including worsening of heart failure, permanent fibrillation, arrhythmias and sudden death. Regarding pacemaker implantation, cardiac resynchronization therapy is shown to be the optimal choice compared to right ventricle apical pacing. His bundle pacing is a promising alternative to cardiac resynchronization therapy and has shown beneficial effects, while left bundle branch pacing is an innovative modality. Conclusions: Atrioventricular node ablation and pacemaker implantation is shown to have beneficial effects on clinical outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation ± heart failure who do not respond or are intolerant to medical treatment. Cardiac resynchronization therapy is the treatment of choice and His bundle pacing seems to be an effective alternative way of pacing in these patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koniari et al. (2023) conducted a review in Heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Atrioventricular node ablation and pacing was evaluated on Clinical outcomes and complications. Atrioventricular node ablation and pacemaker implantation improves symptoms and cardiac performance in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure unresponsive to medical treatment.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0edb6f53f874f2b222dbbchttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10070272
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper