BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine cut-off values for total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) between non-atopic and atopic children with respiratory symptoms. Children of 0-16 years of age were evaluated for respiratory symptoms of >4-week duration. METHODS: Children were divided into two groups: non-atopic children (n=3355) who were non-IgE-sensitized with undetectable allergen-specific IgE (<0.35 kIU(A)/L), and atopic children (n=4620) who were sensitized to > or =1 allergens (specific IgE > or =0.35 kIU(A)/L). Upper and lower centiles were determined and cut-off values calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Serum total IgE increased with age in both groups, although at a variable level and rate, and reached a plateau at 9 and 10 years in non-atopic and atopic children, respectively. Atopic children had on average 14-fold higher serum total IgE compared to non-atopic children. In both groups, the median was lower than the corresponding mean and the distribution skewness was always positive (group I, 0.87; group II, 0.91). In almost all age groups, the 95th percentile for non-atopic children corresponded to the calculated cut-off values, whereas the 10th percentile for atopic children corresponded to the respective cut-off values only until the age of 8 years, after which greater differences between the cut-off values and the 10th percentile were recorded. Cut-off values for total serum IgE in children up to 16 years were determined with diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve of 96%, 91% and 0.950, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 95th percentile for total IgE in non-atopic children and the 10th percentile in atopic children could be taken as cut-off values in children up to 8 years of age, after which significant percentile discrepancies between non-atopic and atopic children were recorded. Since atopic subjects show a more irregular centile distribution, cut-off values are best determined by ROC analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dodig et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: