Key result
Hybrid arch repair yields ~91% technical success at 24 hours in observational cohort.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate early and mid-term outcomes of arch endovascular aortic repair using the hybrid approach over a 13-year single-centre experience.
What are the early and mid-term outcomes of arch endovascular aortic repair using a hybrid approach in patients with aortic arch pathology?
Cohort (n=179)
No
What are the early and mid-term outcomes of arch endovascular aortic repair using a hybrid approach in patients with aortic arch pathology?
Hybrid endovascular repair of aortic arch pathology demonstrates promising early and mid-term clinical success rates, though procedural mortality and morbidity remain notable.
Single-center hybrid arch repair experience supports feasibility in selected patients; leaves open long-term durability versus open repair.
The objective was to evaluate a 13-year single-centre experience of arch endovascular aortic repair using the hybrid approach. Between 1999 and 2013, 491 patients were treated with endografts for thoracic aortic pathologies. The aortic arch was involved in 179 (36.5%) patients (128 men; mean age 70.2 ± 10.8 years, range 27-84). A hybrid approach was performed for all Zone 0 and 1 procedures and in nearly half of Zone 2 procedures. Early and mid-term outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. Overall primary technical success (24 h) was achieved in 162 (90.5%) of the 179 cases; 2 deaths and 15 Type 1 endoleaks were observed. Clinical success at 30 days was achieved in 161 (89.9%) of the 179 patients, with a mortality rate of 4.5% (8/179). Short-term clinical success at 6 months was achieved in 169 (94.4%) of the 179 patients; the rates for the different landing zones did not differ significantly. At a mean follow-up of 27.3 ± 15.7 months (range 1-94), the mid-term clinical success was 165 (92.2%) of the 179 patients; the rates among the different proximal zones did not differ significantly. In selected patients, early and mid-term outcomes of arch endovascular aortic repair using the hybrid approach are promising; however, mortality and morbidity are not negligible. Our results may have practical implications for the ongoing evaluation of the hybrid procedure in the aortic arch, as well as for patients fit for traditional surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiesa et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Aortic arch pathology (n=179). Hybrid arch endovascular aortic repair was evaluated on Overall primary technical success (24 h). Arch endovascular aortic repair using a hybrid approach achieved an overall primary technical success of 90.5% at 24 hours and a mid-term clinical success of 92.2% at a mean 27.3 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: