Key result
Acidosis doubles QRS widening sensitivity to quinidine and propafenone despite reducing myocardial accumulation.
Why the study?
The influence of metabolic and respiratory acidosis on myocardial accumulation and pharmacodynamics of quinidine and propafenone was not well characterized.
Does acidosis alter the myocardial accumulation and pharmacodynamics of quinidine and propafenone in isolated rabbit hearts?
Does acidosis alter the myocardial accumulation and pharmacodynamics of quinidine and propafenone in isolated rabbit hearts?
Acidosis significantly reduces myocardial accumulation of quinidine and propafenone while increasing their effects on ventricular conduction time in isolated rabbit hearts.
The influence of metabolic and respiratory acidosis on the myocardial accumulation and pharmacodynamics of quinidine and propafenone was studied in isolated perfused rabbit hearts. Three pH groups were evaluated: physiologic buffer, pH 7.4; metabolic acidosis, pH 7.0; and respiratory acidosis, pH 7.0. Myocardial accumulation of quinidine and propafenone was significantly reduced during acidosis. Although myocardial quinidine concentrations were similar in the metabolic acidosis group (14.4 +/- 1.2 micrograms/g) and the respiratory acidosis group (14.5 +/- 1.3 micrograms/g), the myocardial propafenone concentration was significantly less during metabolic acidosis (8.9 +/- 2.0 micrograms/g) as compared with respiratory acidosis (12.7 +/- 2.4 micrograms/g, p less than 0.05). The myocardial concentration-effect relationships were linear over the observed myocardial concentration ranges. The slopes of the linear concentration-effect relationships describing QRS duration were increased twofold by both types of acidosis as compared with normal pH (p less than 0.05). In contrast, the slopes of the concentration-effect relationships describing changes in ventricular repolarization and refractoriness were increased only during metabolic acidosis as compared with pH 7.4 (p less than 0.05). Thus, for any given concentration of drugs, the effects of quinidine and propafenone on ventricular conduction time are dependent on the pH of the perfusate, whereas these drug effects on ventricular repolarization and refractoriness are dependent on the buffer composition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glllls et al. (1991) studied this question. Metabolic and respiratory acidosis vs. Physiologic buffer, pH 7.4 was evaluated on Myocardial accumulation and pharmacodynamics (QRS duration, ventricular repolarization and refractoriness) (p=<0.05). Acidosis significantly reduced myocardial accumulation of quinidine and propafenone and increased the slopes of concentration-effect relationships for QRS duration twofold compared with normal pH (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: