Key result
More lateral CIED pocket position is linked to greater standing caudal device displacement.
Why the study?
Displacement of cardiac implantable electronic devices toward the caudal side during standing after implantation may cause lead dislodgement, but its relationship with supine pocket position is unclear.
Does a more lateral CIED pocket position increase device displacement distance when standing in patients undergoing CIED implantation?
Observational (n=134)
Yes
Does a more lateral CIED pocket position increase device displacement distance when standing in patients undergoing CIED implantation?
Implanting a CIED further outside the thorax in the supine position is associated with significantly greater device displacement when standing, which could increase the risk of lead dislodgement.
Lateral CIED pocket position was associated with greater standing displacement; hypothesis-generating for whether medial placement reduces lead dislodgement risk.
BACKGROUND: The displacement of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) toward the caudal side during standing after CIED implantation could cause lead dislodgement. This study investigated the relationship between supine pocket position and standing CIEDs' displacement distance after the implantation. METHODS: After CIED surgeries performed at 2 hospitals between 2012 and 2020, 134 patients underwent postoperative chest x-rays in the supine and standing positions during hospitalization. To measure the displacement distance of CIEDs from the supine to the standing position, we identified the first thoracic vertebrae (Th1) in the supine position using the first rib as an index, drew a horizontal line at the lower edge of the Th1, and calculated the distance from that point to the upper edge of the CIED. The difference between measures for the two positions was compared. At the position of the pocket in the thorax in the supine position, the ratio of the distance between the thorax and the device is defined as the device thorax ratio (DTR). We examined the relationship between DTR and CIED displacement distance. RESULTS: In this study, we included 134 patients (53% men; median age, 79 years, body mass index, 22.3 ± 3.4; pacemaker 93%, left implantation 96%). We found that the more lateral the position of the CIED pocket, the more the CIED fell when standing (confidence interval = 0.34-0.60, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The farther the CIED was implanted outside the thorax in the supine position, the more significantly the CIED was displaced in the standing position.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyamoto et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation (n=134). Lateral position of the CIED pocket (Device Thorax Ratio) vs. Less lateral/medial position of the CIED pocket was evaluated on CIED displacement distance toward the caudal side during standing (95% CI 0.34-0.60, p=<.001). A more lateral position of the CIED pocket in the supine position was significantly associated with greater caudal displacement of the device when standing (CI 0.34-0.60, P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: