This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Citrulline has been advocated as a marker for acute cellular rejection (ACR) in intestinal transplantation; however, its significance as a forewarning in the long-term follow-up remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the association between citrulline levels and the grading of ACR to establish a cutoff point that accurately predicts ACR beyond 3 months posttransplant in the pediatric patient population. During a 16-year period (1995-2011), a total of 13 499 citrulline samples were prospectively collected from 111 consecutive pediatric intestinal/multivisceral transplant recipients: 2155 were obtained concurrently with intestinal biopsies. There were 185 ACR episodes observed among 74/111 (67%) patients (median follow-up: 4.4 years). Citrulline levels were inversely proportional to the severity of ACR. Negative predictive values for any type of ACR (cutoff, 20 μmol/L) and moderate/severe ACR (cutoff, 10 μmol/L) were 95% and 99%, respectively. When patients were divided according to graft size, diagnostic accuracy using the same cutoff was identical. Similarly, subgroup analysis by the timing of citrulline measurement prior to biopsy varying from 1 to 7 days demonstrated comparable results. Citrulline is a potent indicator as a danger signal for ACR, being an exclusionary, noninvasive biomarker with excellent negative predictive values in the long term after pediatric intestinal/multivisceral transplant.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hibi et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: