Key result
D-dimer safely rules out acute aortic syndromes in low-probability patients with ~96% sensitivity.
Why the study?
Rapid diagnosis of acute aortic syndromes is necessary but challenging due to nonspecific symptoms and limitations of current diagnostic tools, highlighting the need for effective biomarkers.
Does D-dimer testing combined with clinical scores accurately rule out acute aortic syndromes in low-risk patients?
Does D-dimer testing combined with clinical scores accurately rule out acute aortic syndromes in low-risk patients?
D-dimer is a highly sensitive biomarker that, when combined with clinical pre-test probability scores, can safely rule out acute aortic syndromes in low-risk patients and reduce unnecessary CTA imaging.
Acute aortic syndromes (AAS) are life-threatening cardiovascular diseases affecting the thoracic aorta, variably involving the abdominal aorta and the main aortic branches. AAS include the subtypes of ‘classic’ aortic dissection (70–90% of cases), intramural haematoma (IMH, more common in elderly and Asian patients), and atherosclerotic penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU). Rapid diagnosis is necessary to prevent negative outcomes, but accurate and efficient recognition of AAS is challenging. AAS lead to a wide range of unspecific clinical signs and symptoms, most commonly caused by other more prevalent diseases such as acute coronary syndromes, pulmonary embolism, stroke, and gastrointestinal diseases.1 Hence, the diagnostic approach to AAS faces the challenges of a low signal to high noise scenario, hampered by both frequent misdiagnoses (5–25%) and low diagnostic yield. The current gold-standard diagnostic test for AAS in the acute setting is contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA). This tool is largely but not universally available in emergency departments and has limits related to risks of anaphylaxis, radiation, and kidney failure. Clinical gestalt, standardized clinical scores (e.g. aortic dissection detection, ADD, and aorta simplified, AORTAs), and echocardiography can rapidly and accurately identify patients at high pre-test probability of AAS, for whom a CTA is urgently indicated. However, for most non-critical patients with compatible symptoms and for patients with atypical and confounding clinical findings, biomarkers can help, particularly in the early rule-out of AAS to reduce overuse of CTA exams. Biomarkers can also identify AAS-related organ damage, thrombosis, inflammation and tissue remodeling, thus contributing to outcome prognostication (Figure 1). Potential aortic biomarkers for diagnosis and prognostication of acute aortic syndromes. ADAMTS, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs; miRNA, microRNA; sST2, soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2. Currently, the aortic biomarker supported by the most compelling data is D-dimer, a plasma fibrin degeneration product largely applied in acute cardiovascular medicine for suspected venous thromboembolism. D-dimer is highly sensitive but only moderately specific for AAS. In a recent meta-analysis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer for AAS were 96% and 70%, using a cut-off value of 500 ng/mL fibrinogen equivalent units.2 However, specificity can be significantly lower, especially in patients with a history of aortic aneurysm and in elderly patients. Accordingly, recent evidence suggests that the application of an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off (calculated as patient’s age × 100), already in use for pulmonary embolism, could slightly improve specificity without compromising sensitivity. In patients classified at low pre-test probability using the ADD or AORTAs score, a negative D-dimer allows to rule out AAS with a pooled sensitivity of 99% and a failure rate of 0.1%.3 So far, only one prospective multi-centre study has validated these findings, but the results of two other large studies are awaited in the near future (clinicaltrials.org NCT04430400 and NCT05582967).4 In compliance with American and European guidelines, pre-test probability assessment should be applied in all non-critical patients with AAS-compatible symptoms, proceeding with D-dimer measurement in patients with an ADD or AORTAs score of 0 or 1. In these low-probability patients, if D-dimer is negative, an AAS can be confidently ruled out. However, a note of caution must be added, remembering that D-dimer negative cases can be found especially in very early or late presenters and in patients with small aortic lesions (e.g. limited IMH or PAU and focal dissections). Another potential caveat for D-dimer might be Asian ethnicity, since the lowest sensitivity estimates for D-dimer have been reported especially in Chinese studies. Apart from D-dimer, other aortic biomarkers represent work in progress, including soluble ST2 and miRNAs.5,6 F.M. received grant support from Università degli Studi di Torino (MORF_RILO_21_02 , MORF_RILO_23_03). Other members of the Study Group on Biomarkers of the ESC Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care include: Evangelos Giannitsis, MD1, Lori Daniels, MD2, Kurt Huber, MD3, Johannes Mair, MD4, Louise Cullen, MD, PhD5, Ola Hammarsten, MD, PhD6, Martin Möckel, MD7, Konstantin Krychtiuk, MD8, Kristian Thygesen, MD9, Matthias Thielmann, MD10, Allan S. Jaffe, MD11 1Department of Cardiology, University Heidelberg, Germany 2Department of Medicine, Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center, University of California, San Diego; La Jolla, CA, SA 3Department of Medicine, Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Wilhelminenhospital, and Sigmund Freud University, Medical School, Vienna, Austria 4Department of Internal Medicine III—Cardiology and Angiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria 5Emergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, University of Queensland, Australia 6Department of Clinical Chemistry and Transfusion Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden 7Division of Emergency Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany 8Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria 9Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark 10Klinik für Thorax- und Kardiovaskuläre Chirurgie, Westdeutsches Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany 11Departments of Cardiology and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minnesota, USA No new data were generated or analysed in support of this research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morello et al. (2024) conducted a review in Acute aortic syndromes (AAS). D-dimer was evaluated. D-dimer testing for acute aortic syndromes demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 70% at a 500 ng/mL cut-off, allowing safe rule-out in low-probability patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: