Key result
Intramyocardial skeletal myoblast transplantation is safe in heart failure but fails to improve LVEF.
Why the study?
The safety and feasibility of percutaneous intramyocardial transplantation of autologous skeletal myoblasts in heart failure patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators was not established.
Does percutaneous intramyocardial transplantation of autologous skeletal myoblasts improve symptoms and cardiac function safely in heart failure patients with ICDs?
RCT (n=40)
Open-label
2:1
Yes
Does percutaneous intramyocardial transplantation of autologous skeletal myoblasts improve symptoms and cardiac function safely in heart failure patients with ICDs?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Percutaneous intramyocardial transplantation of autologous skeletal myoblasts in heart failure patients is feasible and appears safe, but does not significantly improve global LVEF at 6 months.
AIMS: The SEISMIC study was an open-label, prospective, randomised study to assess the safety and feasibility of percutaneous myoblast implantation in heart failure patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were randomised 2:1 to autologous skeletal myoblast therapy vs. optimal medical treatment. The primary safety end-point was defined as the incidence of procedural and device related serious adverse events, whereas the efficacy endpoints were defined as the change in global LVEF by MUGA scan, change in NYHA classification of heart failure and in the distance achieved during a six-minute walk test (6MW) at 6-month follow-up. Forty subjects were randomised to the treatment arm (n=26), or to the control arm (n=14). There were 12 sustained arrhythmic events and one death after episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the treatment group and 14 events in the control group (P=ns). At 6-month follow-up, 6MW distance improved by 60.3±54.1?meters in the treated group as compared to no improvement in the control group (0.4±185.7?meters; P=ns). In the control group, 28.6% experienced worsening of heart failure status (4/14), while 14.3% experienced an improvement in NYHA classification (2/14). In the myoblast-treatment arm, one patient experienced a deterioration in NYHA classification (8.0%), whereas five patients improved one or two classes (20.0%; P=0.06). However, therapy did not improve global LVEF measured by MUGA at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that implantation of myoblasts in patients with HF is feasible, appears to be safe and may provide symptomatic relief, though no significant effect was detected on global LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duckers et al. (2011) conducted an RCT in Congestive heart failure (n=40). Autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation (MyoCell) vs. Optimal medical treatment was evaluated on Proportion of patients experiencing serious adverse events (SAEs) at 6 months (p=0.68). Percutaneous intramyocardial transplantation of autologous skeletal myoblasts was feasible and safe in patients with heart failure, with similar rates of serious adverse events compared to medical therapy (42% vs 36%), but did not significantly improve global left ventricular ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: