Why the study?
Does autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation combined with bypass surgery improve ejection fraction and clinical status in patients with previous myocardial infarction and severe heart failure?
Does autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation combined with bypass surgery improve ejection fraction and clinical status in patients with previous myocardial infarction and severe heart failure?
Autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation combined with bypass surgery in severe ischemic heart failure provides long-term improvement in ejection fraction and clinical status, though it is associated with a notable risk of ventricular arrhythmias requiring device therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support myoblast transplantation in ischemic HF despite arrhythmia risk; hypothesis-generating and leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Skeletal myoblast (SM) transplantation (Tx) in a post-myocardial infarction (MI) scar experimentally improves left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF). Short-term follow-up (FU) studies have suggested that a similar benefit could clinically occur despite an increased risk of LV arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report the long-term FU of the first worldwide cohort of grafted patients (n = 9, 61.8+/-11.6 years, previous MI, EF < or = 35%) operated on (autologous SM Tx and bypass surgery) in 2000 to 2001 and evaluated before Tx, at 1 month (M1) and at a median FU of 52 (18 to 58) months after Tx (37 patient-years). NYHA class improved from 2.5+/-0.5 to 1.8+/-0.4 at M1 (P=0.004 versus baseline) and 1.7+/-0.5 at FU (P=not significant versus M1; P=0.0007 versus baseline). EF increased from 24.3+/-4% to 31+/-4.1% at M1 (+28%, P=0.001 versus baseline) and remained stable thereafter (28.7+/-8.1%, +18% versus baseline). There were 5 hospitalizations for heart failure in 3 patients at 28.6+/-9.9 months, allowing implant in 2 patients with a resynchronization pacemaker. An automatic cardiac defibrillator (ACD) was implanted in 5 patients for nonsustained (n =1) or sustained (n =4) ventricular tachycardia at 12.2+/-18.6 (1 to 45) months. Despite a beta-blocker/amiodarone combination therapy, there were 14 appropriate shocks for 3 arrhythmic storms in 3 patients at 6, 7, and 18 months after ACD implantation. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of severe heart failure patients both clinical status and EF stably improve over time with a strikingly low incidence of hospitalizations for heart failure (0.13/patient-years) and the arrhythmic risk can be controlled by medical therapy and/or on-request ACD implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hagège et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: