Key result
The use of 7.2% NaCl/6% hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 solution did not significantly increase the rate of acute renal injury compared to 0.9% NaCl (20% vs 30%, p=0.72) in patients after ACBS.
Why the study?
Does 7.2% NaCl/6% hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 solution increase the rate of acute renal injury in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery under extracorporeal circulation?
RCT (n=40)
single-blind
randomized
No
Does 7.2% NaCl/6% hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 solution increase the rate of acute renal injury in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery under extracorporeal circulation?
The administration of 7.2% NaCl/6% hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 solution during aortocoronary bypass surgery does not increase the risk of acute renal injury compared to 0.9% NaCl.
7.2% NaCl/6% HES does not increase AKI after on-pump CABG; extends RCT safety data for hypertonic colloids in cardiac surgery.
Objective: to evaluate the safety of using 7.2% NaCl/6% hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 solution to develop acute renal injury (ARI) in patients after aortocoronary bypass surgery (ACBS) under extracorporeal circulation (EC). Subjects and methods. This was a single-center prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial. The patients singly received either 7.2% NaCl/6% hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 solution (a NC/HES group, n=20) or 0.9% NaCl (a control group, n=20) in a dose of 4 ml/kg for 30 min after induction of anesthesia. The primary endpoint was the rate of ARI diagnosed according to the recommendations of the International Organization KRIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes). The secondary endpoints were serum cystatin C (sCys С), and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL). Results. The rate of ARI was comparable in both patient groups. Thus, ARI was found in 4 (20%) patients in the NC/HES group and in 6 (30%) cases in the control group (p=0.72). During the first two postoperative days, the peak concentration of creatinine was significantly lower in the NC/HES group (101 (range 94—107) ^l/l) than in the control one (117 (range 100—127) ^l/l) (p=0.02). That of sCys C was substantially lower in the NC/HES group (0.83 (range 0.73—0.89) mg/l) than in the control one (1.02 (range 0.88—1.15) mg/l) (p=0.001). The patients of the NC/HES group had comparable peak of uNGAL concentrations (33 (range 5—38) ng/ml) versus the controls (30 (range 21—50) ng/ml). Conclusion. The use of NC/HES does not cause any increase in the rate of ARI, increased renal injury, or a more significant decrease in glomerular filtration in patients after ACBS under EC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ломиворотов et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Acute renal injury after aortocoronary bypass surgery under extracorporeal circulation (n=40). 7.2% NaCl/6% hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 solution vs. 0.9% NaCl was evaluated on Rate of acute renal injury (ARI) diagnosed according to KRIGO recommendations (p=0.72). The use of 7.2% NaCl/6% hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 solution did not significantly increase the rate of acute renal injury compared to 0.9% NaCl (20% vs 30%, p=0.72) in patients after ACBS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: