Key result
Rheumatic heart disease linked to ~50% lower 15-year heart transplant survival compared to DCM.
Why the study?
The long-term outcome of heart transplantation in patients with endstage rheumatic heart disease was not well established compared to other etiologies such as dilated cardiomyopathy.
Does heart transplantation yield different long-term survival in patients with endstage rheumatic heart disease compared to those with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=249)
No
Does heart transplantation yield different long-term survival in patients with endstage rheumatic heart disease compared to those with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Absolute Event Rate: 22.7% vs 45.7%
p-value: p=0.038
Heart transplantation for endstage rheumatic heart disease is associated with significantly lower 15-year survival compared to transplantation for dilated cardiomyopathy.
Should not yet alter transplant candidacy by etiology; leaves open whether disease-specific factors drive survival differences.
BACKGROUND: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains a significant cause of cardiovascular disease in developing countries. The nonsuppurative cardiovascular sequel of group A streptococcal infection is sustained inflammatory and immune reactions toward the myocardium and valves. This study attempted to determine the long-term outcome of heart transplantation in endstage RHD patients.Methods and Results:The 23 patients with endstage RHD at National Taiwan University Hospital between June 1987 and March 2012 were enrolled. In the same period, 226 dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients were enrolled as the control group. The RHD group experienced more right ventricular failure and higher central venous pressure than the control group, which resulted in impaired liver and kidney function. The RHD patients had a lower 15-year survival rate than the DCM patients after transplantation (22.7% vs. 45.7%, P=0.038) and higher incidence of tricuspid regurgitation than the control group (32.2% vs. 11.4%). No differences existed between the groups for the mitral regurgitation rate (RHD 37.7% vs. DCM 29.4%, P=0.562). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperatively, the RHD patients suffered more tricuspid regurgitation than the control group. The aortic and mitral valves in both groups functioned well over the long term. Heart transplantation for endstage RHD had a long-term survival rate that was inferior to that for DCM patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chi et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Endstage heart disease requiring heart transplantation (n=249). Rheumatic heart disease vs. Dilated cardiomyopathy was evaluated on 15-year survival rate (p=0.038). Patients with endstage rheumatic heart disease had a significantly lower 15-year survival rate after heart transplantation compared to patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (22.7% vs. 45.7%, p=0.038).
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: