Key result
Higher Body Shape Index Risk linked to ~3.5-fold higher coronary artery calcification in dyslipidemia.
Why the study?
Among different cardiovascular risk predictors, it is unclear which have the best associations with coronary artery calcification in dyslipidemic patients.
Are A Body Shape Index Risk (ABSIR) and Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) associated with coronary artery calcification in dyslipidemic patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=180)
Are A Body Shape Index Risk (ABSIR) and Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) associated with coronary artery calcification in dyslipidemic patients?
Odds Ratio: 3.5 (95% CI 1.38–1.64)
p-value: p=0.001
A Body Shape Index Risk (ABSIR) and Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) are strong, independent predictors of coronary artery calcification in dyslipidemic patients.
May aid CAC risk assessment in dyslipidemic patients; leaves open prospective validation of incremental value.
Objective: To identify, among different Cardiovascular Risk Predictors (CVRP), which have the best associations with Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC). Methodology: Cross-sectional study, with dyslipidemic (age >18), to investigate the association between CVRP [anthropometrics, biochemicals, clinicals, Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI), arterial stiffness] and Coronary Calcium Score (CCS), which was classified according to (1) CCS=0, CCS=1-100, CCS>100, (2) CCS=0, CCS=1-99, CCS=100-299, CCS>300 and (3) dichotomous (CCS=0 or CCS>P75/CCS>100). Bivariate descriptive and inferential statistics were performed. ROC curves estimated the CAC risk of the independent variable. The univariate logistic regression model identified the probability of CAC and established the sensitivity and the specificity of each predictor and the multivariate identified higher risk variables and their respective Odds Ratio (OR). Results: 180 patients evaluated, 65.5% were women, mean age 59.8. CAC was associated with Waist Circumference (p=0.03), A Body Shape Index Risk-ABSIR (p<0.001), Conicity Index (p<0.001), Waist-to-Height Ratio (p<0.001) (T Student test); Pulse Wave Velocity-PWV was associated with CAC for both (1) and (2) CCS classification (p<0.001) (Anova test with Duncan post-hoc test) and it also showed greater sensitivity on ROC curve (3) (AUC 0.61, with a sensitivity of 72.2). In multi-adjusted regression, ABSIR increased the risk of CAC by 3.5 times (CI 95%=1.38-1.64, p=0.001) and PWV by 36% (CI 95%=1.13-1.64, p<0.01). Conclusions: ABSIR and arterial stiffness (PWV) made it possible to obtain a better value for CAC prognosis, being the ABSIR an easy and cheap method, very useful in Public Health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagano et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Dyslipidemia (n=180). A Body Shape Index Risk (ABSIR) vs. Lower ABSIR values was evaluated on Probability of Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) (OR 3.50, 95% CI 1.38-1.64, p=0.001). A Body Shape Index Risk (ABSIR) increased the risk of coronary artery calcification by 3.5 times (OR 3.50), and Pulse Wave Velocity increased it by 36% (OR 1.36) in dyslipidemic patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: