Key result
ASPIRE integration package boosts 6-month self-measured blood pressure engagement ~52% over free devices alone.
Why the study?
Addressing barriers to self-measured blood pressure engagement through tailored implementation strategies is critical for improving hypertension-related outcomes in under-resourced primary care settings.
Does a multifaceted clinical integration package improve self-measured blood pressure engagement and reduce systolic blood pressure in underserved patients with hypertension?
RCT (n=50)
Open-label
1:1
No
Does a multifaceted clinical integration package improve self-measured blood pressure engagement and reduce systolic blood pressure in underserved patients with hypertension?
A multifaceted clinical integration package for self-measured blood pressure monitoring is feasible and significantly improves SMBP engagement and systolic blood pressure in under-resourced primary care settings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports adoption of multifaceted SMBP packages in under-resourced primary care; extends RCT evidence to underserved hypertensive populations.
BACKGROUND: Addressing barriers to self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) engagement through tailored implementation strategies is critical for improving hypertension-related outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of implementing the ASPIRE Clinical Integration Package, a multifaceted intervention designed to support SMBP adoption and engagement in under-resourced primary care settings. DESIGN: This randomized trial was conducted in 2024 at one large primary care clinic serving racially and ethnically diverse populations. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were eligible if they had hypertension, were prescribed ≥1 blood pressure-lowering medication, and presented to the clinic with an elevated blood pressure reading. APPROACH: Patients were randomized to receive a free SMBP device (control; n=25) or a free SMBP device and the ASPIRE Clinical Integration Package (intervention; n=25) which included 6 components; 1. Cuff sizing, 2. Training on accurate readings, 3. ASPIRE log, 4. Reminders/support for sharing readings, 5. Social needs screening, 6. Clinic workflow for SMBP documentation. The primary outcomes included feasibility metrics (referral, recruitment, and retention) and fidelity described in terms of the proportion of patients who received each of the 6 ASPIRE components. Secondary outcomes included SMBP engagement (1+ reading documented in the electronic health record) and change in systolic blood pressure. KEY RESULTS: In total, 50 patients were randomized and included in analyses. Referral (60.0%), recruitment (60.2%), and retention (90.0%) targets were met. Fidelity evaluation revealed that 100% of patients received components 1 - 4, 96% and 93% received components 5 and 6, respectively. At 6-months the difference in SMBP engagement was 52.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 29.3%-74.7%) favoring the intervention arm, and the difference in change in systolic blood pressure was -11.9mmHg (95% CI -21.7, -2.1) favoring the intervention arm. CONCLUSIONS: The ASPIRE Clinical Integration Package demonstrates feasibility and acceptability in promoting SMBP adoption in under-resourced primary care settings. These findings lay the groundwork for a larger trial to assess effectiveness in improving hypertension control and reducing disparities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06175793.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khatib et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Hypertension (n=50). ASPIRE Clinical Integration Package vs. Free SMBP device (standard practice) was evaluated on Feasibility (retention: ≥1 ambulatory blood pressure reading documented during 6-month follow-up) (90.0%, 95% CI 78.2-96.7). The ASPIRE Clinical Integration Package met feasibility targets with 90.0% retention and increased 6-month self-measured blood pressure engagement by 52.0% compared to providing a free device alone.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: