Key result
Impaired left atrial reservoir strain independently predicts adverse clinical outcomes across all mitral regurgitation etiologies.
Why the study?
Conventional metrics may underestimate early mechanical impairment in mitral regurgitation, necessitating synthesis of evidence on left atrial strain across MR phenotypes and its prognostic utility.
Does left atrial strain assessment using speckle-tracking echocardiography predict disease severity and clinical outcomes in adult patients with mitral regurgitation?
Systematic Review (n=5,781)
Does left atrial strain assessment using speckle-tracking echocardiography predict disease severity and clinical outcomes in adult patients with mitral regurgitation?
Left atrial reservoir strain is a sensitive, consistent marker of atrial dysfunction in mitral regurgitation that identifies mechanical impairment prior to irreversible remodeling and predicts adverse clinical outcomes.
Left atrial reservoir strain may refine mitral regurgitation risk stratification; extends observational evidence by confirming consistent impairment and independent outcome prediction across etiologies.
Objectives Mitral regurgitation (MR) induces progressive atrial remodelling and dysfunction, yet conventional metrics may underestimate early mechanical impairment. This systematic review synthesised evidence on left atrial strain (LAS) across MR phenotypes, its prognostic utility and its response to intervention. Design Systematic review conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data sources MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL and Web of Science were searched from 1 January 2010 to 10 July 2026. Eligibility criteria Studies of adult patients with MR of any aetiology or severity using speckle-tracking echocardiography to report quantitative LAS. Case reports, reviews, conference abstracts without full text and non-English publications were excluded. Data extraction and synthesis Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Exposures tool, with a third reviewer resolving disagreements. Substantial heterogeneity precluded quantitative meta-analysis. Results Left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) was universally reduced in patients with MR compared with controls across all aetiologies. Secondary MR demonstrated more severe impairment than primary MR, reflecting combined volume and pressure overload. Progressive LAS deterioration accompanied increasing MR severity, with LASr independently predicting surgical necessity and outperforming left ventricular global longitudinal strain as a severity marker. Multiple prognostic thresholds demonstrated independent predictive value for adverse outcomes: LASr <35% predicted cardiovascular events, while LASr ≤15% in secondary MR independently predicted mortality. Postintervention LAS responses demonstrated substantial heterogeneity; patients achieving ≥15% LASr improvement experienced significantly lower all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalisation, establishing LAS recovery as a surrogate marker of successful reverse remodelling. Conclusions LASr is a sensitive, consistent marker of atrial dysfunction in MR, identifying mechanical impairment prior to irreversible remodelling. As most supporting evidence is retrospective and single-centre, further prospective validation will help establish standardised thresholds for clinical use. PROSPERO registration number CRD420251126721.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dabash et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Mitral regurgitation (n=5,781). Left atrial strain assessment in mitral regurgitation vs. Healthy controls or lower severity mitral regurgitation was evaluated on Left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) impairment and prognostic utility. Left atrial reservoir strain is universally reduced in patients with mitral regurgitation compared with controls across all etiologies, and progressive deterioration independently predicts adverse clinical outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: