Key result
Global PALS strongly correlates with pulse pressure variation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
Why the study?
The relationship between pulse pressure variation and echocardiographic indices of left ventricular filling pressures in critically ill patients was not well characterized.
Does peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) correlate with pulse pressure variation (PPV) for assessing fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients?
Observational (n=22)
Does peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) correlate with pulse pressure variation (PPV) for assessing fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients?
Effect estimate: R2 0.80
p-value: p=<0.001
Global peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) by speckle tracking echocardiography correlates well with pulse pressure variation and may serve as a non-invasive alternative to assess fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.
BACKGROUND: Pulse pressure variation (PPV) is a dynamic index of fluid responsiveness. This parameter helps clinicians in improving haemodynamic status while avoiding potential fluid overload. Echocardiographic indices, such as E/E' ratio and left atrial (LA) strain by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), are used to estimate left ventricular (LV) filling pressures. This study aimed at exploring the relationship between PPV and echocardiographic indices of LV filling pressures in critically ill patients. METHODS: Twenty-two patients (mean age of 50.9 ± 21.6, male/female = 15/7) admitted to intensive care unit, and requiring mechanical ventilation and invasive arterial pressure monitoring, were studied. In all patients, two independent operators assessed simultaneously PPV, using a pulse contour method, mean E/E' ratio and peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) by means of STE. PALS values were obtained by averaging LA segments measured in the 4-chamber and 2-chamber views (global PALS). RESULTS: A significant negative correlation was found between mean E/E' ratio and PPV (R(2) = -0.76; P<0.001). A positive correlation between global PALS and PPV was found (R(2) = 0.80, P<0.001). Mean global PALS of 26.2% demonstrated excellent accuracy (Area Under Roc Curve = 0.86, P<0.001), and good sensitivity (92%) and specificity (86%) in predicting a PPV >15%. CONCLUSION: In a group of mechanically ventilated patients PPV, derived from pulse contour analysis, and echocardiographic preload parameters were well correlated. Global PALS by STE provided better estimation of PPV than mean E/E' ratio. PALS seems a potential alternative to PPV in assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cameli et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation (n=22). Echocardiographic indices (E/E' ratio and global PALS) was evaluated on Correlation between pulse pressure variation (PPV) and echocardiographic indices of left ventricular filling pressures (R2 0.80, p=<0.001). In mechanically ventilated critically ill patients, global peak atrial longitudinal strain strongly correlated with pulse pressure variation (R2=0.80, P<0.001) and accurately predicted PPV >15%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: