Key result
ACE inhibitors are proven medical therapies that reduce mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction, shifting the clinical focus from research to practical implementation.
Why the study?
Do ACE inhibitors reduce mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Do ACE inhibitors reduce mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Oral ACE inhibitors are an established, life-saving therapy for acute myocardial infarction, shifting the focus from clinical trials to practical implementation by frontline physicians.
A ngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have earned their place along with aspirin, -blockers, and thrombolytic agents as medical therapies proven to reduce mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction. 1 The results of well-conducted, randomized, controlled clinical trials have been so consistent and so conclusive that the emphasis now shifts from research to implementation.Because the trials demonstrated that the oral use of an ACE inhibitor can save lives, the pragmatic questions of who and when to treat are left to the frontline physicians.Unlike the clinical trial experience with its protocol-directed inclusion and exclusion criteria, time window for initiation, and the informed consent process, the practicing physician must make decisions on the basis of his or her current assessment of the relative merits as well as the potential for harm by an ACE inhibitor for individual patients.Because any further major placebo-controlled trials of ACE inhibitors in acute myocardial infarction are not likely, physicians must use the sum of the currently available information to make the best choices for their patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marc Alan Pfeffer (1998) conducted an editorial in acute myocardial infarction. ACE inhibitors was evaluated on mortality. ACE inhibitors are proven medical therapies that reduce mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction, shifting the clinical focus from research to practical implementation.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: